economics

kalshiMarch 23, 20263d ago

Will the President be impeached before Jan 20, 2029?

Will the President of the United States be impeached before Jan 20, 2029?

View on kalshi

Signal

SELL

Probability

52%

Market: 68%Edge: -16pp

Confidence

MEDIUM

55%

Summary.

The market prices Trump impeachment before January 20, 2029 at 68%, while my analysis estimates 52% probability—a 16-point divergence suggesting the market is overconfident. The core question reduces to: (1) Will Democrats flip the House in November 2026 midterms (~62% probability, given they need only 3 net seats and historical first-midterm patterns favor opposition), and (2) Will they impeach if they win control (~87% probability, given 140 Democrats already voted for articles in December 2025 and party leadership acknowledges impeachment would be "immediate")? Combined probability: 0.62 × 0.87 ≈ 52%. The market appears to underweight the ~38% chance Republicans retain the House despite their razor-thin 220-215 majority, possibly due to recency bias from multiple recent impeachment articles (H.Res. 415, H.Res. 939, AG Bondi articles) and availability bias from Trump's unique two-prior-impeachment history. However, eight months until midterms represents substantial uncertainty—economic performance, Trump approval trends, and campaign dynamics could preserve GOP control. Polymarket's lower 45% estimate corroborates that Kalshi may reflect trader population skew rather than true probability. Key temporal note: We are 232 days from the critical midterm catalyst and 1,033 days from resolution, giving ample time for impeachment if Democrats win but also ample time for political winds to shift.

Reasoning.

Step-by-step probability analysis:

TEMPORAL CONTEXT: As of March 23, 2026, we are 232 days from the November 2026 midterm elections and 1,033 days from the January 20, 2029 resolution deadline. President Trump is approximately 14 months into his second term.

STEP 1: Decomposing the question into conditional probabilities

For Trump to be impeached before Jan 20, 2029, one of these paths must occur:

Path A: Democrats take House in Nov 2026 midterms AND impeach during 120th Congress (2027-2029)
Path B: Current GOP House impeaches Trump (extremely unlikely given party loyalty)
Path C: GOP retains House in 2026 but later impeaches (near-zero probability)

Path A dominates the analysis, making this fundamentally a question about:

Will Democrats win House control in Nov 2026?
If yes, will they impeach Trump?

STEP 2: Probability Democrats take House in November 2026

Favorable factors for Democratic takeover:

Historical pattern: President's party loses average of 26-30 House seats in first midterm
Current GOP margin is razor-thin: ~220-215 (only need to flip 3 net seats)
140 House Democrats already voted for impeachment articles in Dec 2025, showing unified opposition
Generic ballot polling typically favors opposition party in midterm year
Trump remains polarizing figure with high unfavorability among independents

Unfavorable factors for Democratic takeover:

8 months remains until election; economic/political landscape could shift dramatically
GOP has incumbency advantages and gerrymandered districts from 2020 redistricting
Trump's base remains energized; 2024 election showed his continued electoral strength
Midterm turnout patterns uncertain in Trump era (2018 Dems won, 2022 underperformed)
Presidential warnings about impeachment may galvanize GOP turnout

Assessment: Democrats have structural advantages but outcome remains highly uncertain 8 months out. Estimate ~60-65% probability Democrats take House in Nov 2026.

STEP 3: Probability of impeachment GIVEN Democratic House control

Evidence for high conditional probability:

140 of ~215 Democrats (65%+) already voted to advance impeachment in Dec 2025
Rep. Al Green introduced articles twice (May 2025, Dec 2025) showing sustained effort
Party leadership (Johnson) and Trump himself acknowledge impeachment would be "immediate" if Dems win
Trump's unique history: already impeached twice before, creating precedent
Cited grounds are extensive: pardons, military actions, appropriations violations, court defiance
Democratic base expects impeachment; failure to act would face backlash
Only requires simple House majority (218 votes); no Senate conviction needed for market resolution

Evidence for lower conditional probability:

Some moderate Democrats may resist impeachment as politically counterproductive
Economic crisis or foreign policy emergency could shift priorities
Democratic leadership might calculate impeachment helps Trump politically (martyrdom effect)
Internal party divisions on strategy (focus on 2028 election vs. accountability)

Assessment: Given the documented party unity (140 votes), multiple articles already drafted, public leadership acknowledgment, and Trump's unique circumstances, conditional probability is very high if Democrats win House. Estimate ~85-90% probability of impeachment given Democratic House control starting January 2027.

STEP 4: Combined probability calculation

P(Impeachment) ≈ P(Dems win House) × P(Impeachment | Dem House) + P(Other paths) P(Impeachment) ≈ 0.62 × 0.87 + 0.02 ≈ 0.54 ≈ 52% central estimate

STEP 5: Market comparison and edge assessment

Kalshi market: 68% (current as of March 23, 2026) Polymarket: 45% (for full term impeachment) My estimate: 52%

The Kalshi market at 68% appears to be overpricing the impeachment probability by ~16 percentage points. This suggests possible edge on the NO side.

Why market might be overconfident:

Availability bias: Recent impeachment articles (Dec 2025, March 2026 AG Bondi) make impeachment feel more imminent than it is
Overweighting Democratic enthusiasm: 140 votes in procedural context doesn't guarantee same in actual majority context
Underweighting midterm uncertainty: 8 months is long time; economic boom, successful policy, or Democratic missteps could preserve GOP House
Confirmation bias in trading pool: High-volume Kalshi traders may skew politically engaged/anti-Trump, creating echo chamber
Anchoring on Trump's history: Two prior impeachments create illusion of inevitability, but circumstances differ

Why my estimate could be wrong (market could be right):

I may be underestimating midterm Democratic advantage given historical patterns
Trump's continued controversies (pardons, Venezuela actions) may further energize opposition
Economic headwinds not fully reflected in my analysis
Democratic base pressure may make impeachment nearly inevitable if they win House
$1.7M trading volume suggests sophisticated market participants with inside information

CONCLUSION: The market at 68% appears moderately overpriced relative to my 52% estimate, primarily because it underweights the ~40% chance Republicans retain House control through November 2026 or the ~10-15% chance Democrats win but choose not to impeach. However, the edge is not massive (16 points), and given the 8-month timeline to midterms, significant uncertainty remains.

Key Factors.

2026 midterm election outcome (November 2026): Democrats need to flip only 3 net seats to gain House control, making this the dominant variable
Historical midterm patterns: President's party typically loses 20-30 House seats in first midterm, strongly favoring Democratic takeover
Demonstrated Democratic party unity: 140 of ~215 House Democrats voted for impeachment articles in December 2025 procedural vote, showing broad caucus support
Timeline advantage: If Democrats win House in Nov 2026, they have 2+ years (Jan 2027 - Jan 2029) to impeach, reducing time pressure
Low bar for resolution: Market only requires House impeachment vote (simple majority), not Senate conviction (2/3 supermajority)
Trump's unique impeachment history: Only president impeached twice before, creating precedent and Democratic expectation for accountability
Current razor-thin GOP House majority (220-215): Makes Republican retention difficult to defend historically
Economic and approval rating trends through fall 2026: Will determine whether historical midterm patterns hold or Trump defies gravity

Scenarios.

Democratic Sweep → Impeachment (Bull Case for YES)

50%

Democrats flip House in November 2026 midterms (gaining 5+ seats), take control in January 2027, and promptly move forward with impeachment articles within first 6 months. Rep. Al Green or House leadership introduces articles citing January 6 pardons, appropriations violations, and other controversies. Vote succeeds along party lines with 220+ votes. Timeline: Impeachment occurs between January-June 2027.

Trigger: Generic ballot polling showing Democrats +6 or better by September 2026; Democratic fundraising advantage; Trump approval below 42%; successful Democratic recruitment of quality candidates in swing districts; high-profile Trump controversies dominating news cycle through fall 2026.

GOP Holds House or Democratic Restraint (Base Case for NO)

48%

Either Republicans narrowly retain House majority in November 2026 midterms (maintaining 218+ seats), making impeachment impossible, OR Democrats win House but moderate wing successfully argues against impeachment as counterproductive politics. In GOP retention scenario, Trump serves full term without impeachment. In Democratic restraint scenario, leadership focuses on investigations and 2028 election strategy instead.

Trigger: Strong economic growth (GDP >3%, unemployment <4%) through 2026; Trump approval stabilizing at 46-48%; GOP closing generic ballot gap to even by October 2026; Successful legislative wins for Trump; OR post-election, Democratic moderates from swing districts publicly oppose impeachment; polling shows impeachment unpopular with independents.

Late-Term Crisis Impeachment (Bear Case - Low Probability Alternative)

Republicans retain House in 2026, but major constitutional crisis in 2027-2028 (e.g., defying Supreme Court order, emergency power abuse, corruption scandal) causes 10-20 GOP members to break ranks and support impeachment. This represents the historical 'bipartisan impeachment' scenario seen in Nixon resignation dynamics (though Nixon was never formally impeached).

Trigger: Major scandal with clear evidence documented by Republican-led investigation; Supreme Court unanimous ruling against Trump that he openly defies; Cabinet resignations in protest; Former Trump officials (e.g., Vice President, Cabinet members) publicly calling for impeachment; GOP senators signaling conviction support, making House impeachment more credible.

Risks.

Midterm forecasting error: 8 months is significant time; economic boom, successful Trump policy wins, or Democratic overreach could preserve GOP House majority despite historical patterns
Democratic internal divisions: Moderate Democrats from swing districts may resist impeachment as politically suicidal, fracturing party unity observed in procedural vote
Black swan events: Major war, terrorist attack, economic crisis, or other emergency could rally nation around president and make impeachment politically impossible
Trump health or resignation: While unlikely, voluntary exit before 2029 would resolve market as NO (resignation is not impeachment)
Polymarket divergence signals uncertainty: Alternative market at 45% vs Kalshi 68% suggests genuine disagreement among informed traders about probability
Overconfidence in historical patterns: Trump has repeatedly defied political gravity; 2022 midterms showed his party outperformed expectations
Market manipulation or insider trading: $1.7M volume could include traders with inside political intelligence not reflected in public analysis
Democratic strategic calculation: Party leadership might conclude impeachment helps Trump play victim and aids his 2028 comeback, choosing restraint over accountability
Gerrymandering effects: Post-2020 redistricting may make flipping House harder than raw seat margin suggests; many districts are non-competitive
Timing risk: Even if Democrats win House, unexpected delays, parliamentary tactics, or priority shifts could push impeachment beyond Jan 2029 deadline

Edge Assessment.

MODERATE EDGE ON NO (selling at 68% / buying NO at 32%).

My estimated probability of 52% vs market price of 68% suggests the market is overpricing impeachment likelihood by approximately 16 percentage points. This represents a potential +50% edge on NO side (32% market price vs 48% true probability of NO).

Rationale for edge:

Market overweights recent salience: Multiple impeachment articles in past year (May 2025, Dec 2025, March 2026 for AG Bondi) create recency bias making impeachment feel more inevitable than probability math supports.
Insufficient discounting of midterm uncertainty: 8 months until November 2026 election is long time politically. Market seems to price Democratic House takeover at ~80%+, which is higher than fundamentals support given GOP incumbency advantages and Trump's proven ability to mobilize base.
Divergence from Polymarket (45%) suggests fragmentation: When major prediction markets disagree significantly, it often signals overconfidence in one venue. Polymarket's 45% is closer to my 52% estimate, suggesting Kalshi may have trader selection bias.
Conditional probability overestimate: Market may be pricing P(Impeachment|Dem House) near 95-100%, but Democratic moderates' electoral incentives and strategic considerations suggest 85-90% is more realistic.

Kelly Criterion sizing: With 52% true probability vs 32% market price on NO, Kelly suggests betting ~15-20% of bankroll on NO (assuming 1:1 payoff and typical market fees). However, given:

0.55 confidence level (moderate uncertainty)
1,033 days until resolution (long time horizon, opportunity cost)
Political prediction market volatility

I would recommend conservative position sizing at 5-10% of bankroll on NO, or waiting for market to move above 70% for stronger edge.

Important caveat: Edge could disappear or reverse if:

Economic data deteriorates significantly by summer 2026
Trump approval drops below 40% sustained
Major scandal emerges with bipartisan condemnation
Generic ballot shows Democrats +8 or better by fall 2026

Monitor these indicators monthly. If Democrats show commanding lead by September 2026, market price may prove correct and position should be closed.

What Would Change Our Mind.

Generic ballot polling showing Democrats with sustained +8 or greater advantage by September 2026, indicating likely House flip beyond my 62% estimate
Trump job approval falling below 40% and remaining there through summer 2026, suggesting midterm environment worse than modeled
Major bipartisan scandal or Supreme Court defiance crisis that causes GOP House members to publicly consider impeachment before midterms
Economic recession or GDP contraction in Q2/Q3 2026, which would dramatically increase Democratic midterm prospects
Democratic House candidates outraising GOP incumbents 2:1 or greater in competitive districts by August 2026
Republican seat projections falling to 210 or below in aggregate forecasts (538, Cook Political, Sabato) by October 2026
Post-midterm: If Democrats win House majority in November 2026, immediate introduction of impeachment articles in December 2026 lame-duck session or January 2027 would signal higher-than-expected commitment
Moderate Democrats from Biden-won swing districts publicly endorsing impeachment after midterm victory, reducing my conditional probability concern

Sources.

Get This Via API.

Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.

curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/analyze \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"category": "economics", "platform": "kalshi"}'

Get API Key Read Docs

Related Analysis.

economics

SELL

Bitcoin reaches $90,000 in March 2026

Based on temporal grounding as of March 20, 2026, this bet has an estimated probability of approximately 2% compared to any market pricing above 5% representing significant mispricing. Bitcoin currently trades at $70,650 and requires a 27% gain to reach $90,000 within just 11 remaining days—a historically rare move that becomes virtually unprecedented given the hostile current environment. Bitcoin already failed to breach $90,000 during March, with the monthly high reaching only $76,000 before the March 18 Fed meeting triggered a 4% selloff. The macro backdrop has severely deteriorated: the Fed maintained hawkish policy at 3.50%-3.75% with sticky inflation (Core PCE 2.8%, February PPI +0.7%), Iran strikes sent oil to $119/barrel adding inflationary pressure, and $158 million in leveraged longs were liquidated. Derivatives positioning is overwhelmingly defensive (put-call ratio at 0.77, highest since mid-2021; funding rates collapsed from 4.1% to 2.7%). No identifiable catalyst exists to drive the required breakout within 11 days. While ETF inflows of $1.3 billion showed some institutional interest, this proved insufficient to break the established $60K-$72K range. The confluence of severe time constraint, hawkish monetary policy, geopolitical energy shocks, bearish market structure, and absence of positive catalysts makes a 27% rally extraordinarily unlikely, justifying the low 2% probability estimate with high confidence (92%).

2%Mar 20, 2026

economics

NO TRADE

Bitcoin to reach $90,000 in March 2026

Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, I estimate an 8% probability that Bitcoin will reach $90,000 before March 31, 2026 (confidence level: 82%). This is a low-probability tail event requiring a 22-29% price surge in just 11 days from the current $70,000-$74,000 trading range. Bitcoin's March 17 peak of $76,000 fell $14,000 short of target and has since consolidated lower, signaling momentum weakness. The March 17-18 FOMC delivered a hawkish shock—cutting 2026 rate expectations to just one cut and raising inflation forecasts to 2.7%—creating a hostile macro environment for speculative assets. Multiple technical resistance levels ($75k-$78.9k, then $83k) must be breached in rapid succession without time for consolidation. Historically, 25%+ Bitcoin moves in 11-day periods are extremely rare outside peak bull euphoria or major catalytic events, neither of which are currently present. While $700M in ETF inflows and MicroStrategy's $1.6B purchase demonstrate strong institutional demand, this pace is insufficient to drive the required parabolic move. The primary risk to this assessment is a black swan positive catalyst (major institutional adoption announcement, regulatory breakthrough, or geopolitical de-escalation) that could trigger FOMO-driven momentum. Without market odds provided, I cannot determine if an exploitable edge exists, but probabilities above 15% would likely represent overvaluation.

8%Mar 20, 2026

economics

NO TRADE

Fed interest rate decrease at next meeting

The market-implied probability of a Fed rate cut at the March 18, 2026 meeting is 3-4% across multiple sources (CME FedWatch >90% no change, Investing.com 97% no change, Polymarket 96% no change). My estimated probability of 4% is essentially identical to market consensus. This alignment reflects appropriate assessment of current conditions: PCE inflation remains elevated at 2.9% (well above the Fed's 2% target), the labor market is strong with 4.3% unemployment, the Fed characterized economic activity as "expanding at solid pace" in January, and only 2 of 12 FOMC members dissented in favor of cuts. While Q4 GDP slowed to 1.4% and inflation trends are improving (CPI at 2.4%), these factors are insufficient to justify immediate action with only 3-4 weeks until the meeting. The Fed is highly predictable at this short horizon, and the overwhelming market consensus reflects proper calibration rather than mispricing. No meaningful edge exists at current odds.

4%Feb 22, 2026