rekko.ai
economicskalshi logokalshiApril 2, 20266h ago

More tech layoffs in 2026 than in 2025?

More tech layoffs in 2026 than in 2025?

Resolves Mar 31, 2027, 3:00 PM UTC
View on kalshi

Signal

NO TRADE

Probability

78%

Market: 87%Edge: -9pp

Confidence

MEDIUM

55%

Summary.

The market prices an 87.25% probability that 2026 U.S. Information sector layoffs will exceed 447,000 (the 2025 baseline), but my analysis suggests 78% is more appropriate—a modest 9-percentage-point edge. While macroeconomic conditions have deteriorated sharply in Q1 2026 (Fed holding rates at 3.5-3.75% despite growth concerns, oil shock from U.S.-Iran conflict pushing Brent crude to $114/barrel, labor market cooling with hires at lowest level since April 2020, and recession probability elevated to 30-50%), critical data gaps create meaningful uncertainty. Only ~45,000 global tech layoffs are tracked through Q1 2026, though major announcements (Amazon 16k, Oracle 10k, Block 4k, Meta 2.2k) suggest ~32,000 additional cuts from just four companies. The 447,000 threshold is extremely high, requiring 2026 to exceed what was already a severe 2025. Key uncertainties include: whether announced cuts execute predominantly in U.S. Information sector vs. globally; whether recession materializes or growth stabilizes; whether AI-driven restructuring accelerates or moderates with offsetting AI hiring; and whether the geopolitical oil shock persists or resolves. The market's near-certainty (87%) appears slightly overconfident given these execution, timing, and geographic risks, though stable pricing suggests informed participants may possess proprietary data supporting their conviction.

Reasoning.

Step 1: Define the resolution threshold and current trajectory

The market resolves YES if U.S. Information sector layoffs exceed 447,000 in 2026 (the 2025 baseline). As of April 2, 2026 (Q1), we're only ~25% through the year with preliminary data showing ~45,000 global tech layoffs tracked.

Critical data gap: The 45,000 figure is:

  • Global (not U.S.-specific Information sector)
  • From third-party trackers (incomplete coverage)
  • May not yet reflect announced cuts (Amazon 16k, Oracle 10k, Block 4k, Meta 2.2k = ~32k just from 4 companies)

If major announced cuts execute in Q2-Q3 and are U.S.-focused, we could be tracking toward 150,000-200,000+ by year-end from announced actions alone.

Step 2: Assess macroeconomic deterioration

The economic environment has sharply worsened since early 2026:

Monetary tightening persists: Fed held at 3.50-3.75% (March 18), revised inflation up to 2.7%, signals only 1 cut for all of 2026. CME FedWatch shows 97.9% hold probability for April meeting. Markets briefly priced 50%+ hike probability by year-end—a hawkish shock.

Energy shock/stagflation risk: U.S.-Iran conflict drove Brent crude to $114/barrel. This creates cost pressures (hurts margins) while dampening consumer demand—classic stagflation setup that historically triggers layoffs.

Credit conditions tightening: 10-year Treasury yields surged to 4.3-4.5%. Private credit inflows fell 33%—eliminating funding lifeline for startups and growth-stage tech companies that are layoff-vulnerable.

Labor market cooling: February JOLTS showed total U.S. hires plummeted 500k to 4.8M (lowest since April 2020). Unemployment ticked to 4.4%. This suggests broader economic weakness that typically cascades to tech.

Recession probability elevated: Moody's and Goldman raised recession odds to 30-50% over next 12 months.

Step 3: Assess structural tech sector factors

AI-driven restructuring: This is a secular shift, not cyclical. Block explicitly cited "AI productivity tools" for cutting 40% of workforce. Meta is pivoting from metaverse to AI. Oracle is restructuring for AI data centers. This could sustain elevated layoffs even if recession is avoided.

2025 baseline context: 447,000 is an extremely high threshold—it implies 2025 had massive layoffs already. If 2025 saw elevated cuts during the earlier phase of this cycle, there may be "cutting fatigue" or limited further headcount to trim. However, major tech firms still announced significant Q1 2026 cuts, suggesting they weren't fully optimized yet.

Step 4: Build probability estimate

Bull case for YES (exceeds 447k):

  • Announced cuts already approach 150k+ if fully executed in U.S. Information sector
  • Stagflation scenario persists, triggering Q2-Q4 waves
  • AI restructuring accelerates across industry
  • Recession materializes (30-50% base probability)
  • Private credit crunch forces startup failures and mass layoffs
  • Linear extrapolation if current pace continues: 45k × 4 = 180k, BUT this ignores announced cuts not yet executed and potential acceleration

Bear case for NO (stays below 447k):

  • U.S.-Iran conflict de-escalates, oil prices normalize
  • Fed pivots to cuts by mid-year, easing financial conditions
  • Major announced cuts are global, not predominantly U.S. Information sector
  • AI hiring offsets AI-driven cuts (net effect smaller)
  • Labor market stabilizes, recession avoided
  • 2025 baseline of 447k was already so high that comparable 2026 total is unlikely

Step 5: Compare to market odds

Market odds: 87.25% YES

My assessment:

  • Macro deterioration is real and significant (stagflation risk, Fed hawkishness, credit tightening)
  • Announced cuts are large but execution timing and geographic split are uncertain
  • Q1 run-rate of 45k seems low, but may not capture announced actions yet
  • The 447k threshold is very high—suggests 2025 was already a severe year
  • If 2025 had 447k cuts and we're in worsening conditions, exceeding it is plausible but not 87% certain

Estimated probability: 78%

The market at 87.25% appears slightly overconfident. While conditions are deteriorating rapidly, the threshold is extremely high, and we're only seeing preliminary Q1 data. There's meaningful uncertainty around:

  1. Whether announced cuts are predominantly U.S. Information sector
  2. Whether recession actually materializes (still only 30-50% probability)
  3. Whether oil shock is transitory
  4. Whether AI hiring partially offsets AI-driven cuts

A 78% estimate reflects high probability of exceeding 447k given the macro environment and announced cuts, but acknowledges execution risk, geographic uncertainty, and the possibility of stabilization in H2 2026.

Key Factors.

  • Threshold is extremely high at 447,000 layoffs (2025 baseline)—requires assessing whether 2026 conditions are worse than 2025

  • Major announced cuts (Amazon 16k, Oracle 10k, Block 4k, Meta 2.2k+) total ~32k from just 4 companies, suggesting significant base of confirmed actions

  • Stagflation risk from U.S.-Iran conflict (oil at $114/barrel) creates dual pressure: margin compression and demand destruction

  • Fed maintaining restrictive policy (3.5-3.75%) with only 1 cut signaled for full year 2026, revised inflation up to 2.7%

  • Credit conditions severely tightened: 10-year yields at 4.3-4.5%, private credit inflows down 33%—eliminating startup funding lifeline

  • Labor market cooling rapidly: February JOLTS showed hiring plummeted 500k to 4.8M (lowest since April 2020), unemployment at 4.4%

  • Recession probability elevated to 30-50% by major institutions (Moody's, Goldman Sachs)

  • Structural AI-driven workforce restructuring is secular, not purely cyclical—Block cited AI productivity for 40% workforce cut

  • Critical data gap: Q1 2026 tracker shows only 45k global layoffs, but may not yet reflect announced cuts or distinguish U.S. Information sector specifically

  • Geographic and sectoral uncertainty: Layoffs.fyi tracks global tech broadly, resolution requires U.S. Information sector specifically

Scenarios.

Stagflation Acceleration (Bull Case for YES)

45%

U.S.-Iran conflict persists or escalates, keeping oil prices elevated through mid-2026. Fed maintains restrictive policy (3.5-3.75% through Q3), potentially hiking once. Recession materializes by Q3 2026 (within the 30-50% probability window). Tech companies execute announced layoffs (Amazon 16k, Oracle 10k, Block 4k, Meta 2.2k+) predominantly in U.S., and additional waves follow in Q2-Q4 as startups fail due to private credit crunch. AI restructuring accelerates industry-wide as companies realize productivity gains. U.S. Information sector layoffs reach 500,000-600,000 by year-end, comfortably exceeding the 447k threshold. This scenario assumes macro deterioration continues on current trajectory.

Trigger: Continued elevated Brent crude above $100/barrel through Q2; Fed holds or hikes at June/July FOMC meetings; Q2 GDP growth turns negative; additional major tech company layoff announcements in May-July 2026; unemployment rate rises above 4.7% by Q3.

Soft Landing with AI Churn (Base Case)

33%

U.S.-Iran tensions partially de-escalate by mid-2026, bringing oil prices down to $85-95/barrel range. Fed delivers the one rate cut signaled in dot plot (likely Q3 or Q4), easing financial conditions modestly. Recession is avoided but growth remains sluggish (1-1.5% GDP). Major announced layoffs execute as planned, yielding ~150,000-200,000 from large firms. AI-driven restructuring continues but at moderate pace, with some offset from AI/ML hiring. Private credit stabilizes. U.S. Information sector layoffs total 380,000-480,000, creating genuine uncertainty around the 447k threshold. This scenario reflects a muddled outcome where macro pressures persist but don't cascade into full crisis.

Trigger: Oil prices decline below $100/barrel by June 2026; Fed cuts 25bp at September FOMC meeting; Q2-Q3 GDP growth remains positive but weak (0.5-1.5%); unemployment stabilizes at 4.3-4.5%; layoff announcements moderate in Q2 but don't accelerate significantly.

Economic Stabilization (Bear Case for NO)

22%

Diplomatic breakthrough leads to rapid U.S.-Iran de-escalation by May 2026, collapsing oil prices back to $75-85/barrel. Fed delivers 2-3 rate cuts by year-end (more than dot plot suggests) as inflation pressures ease and growth concerns mount. Financial conditions ease meaningfully—10-year yields fall to 3.5-3.8%, private credit rebounds. Labor market stabilizes with hiring recovering. Major announced layoffs either execute slower than expected, are concentrated outside U.S. Information sector, or are partially offset by hiring in AI/cloud segments. Tech sentiment improves in H2 2026. U.S. Information sector layoffs total 300,000-420,000, falling short of the 447k threshold despite elevated H1 cuts.

Trigger: Brent crude falls below $85/barrel by June; Fed cuts 25bp at both July and September FOMC meetings; positive GDP surprises in Q2-Q3 (above 2%); unemployment rate declines back toward 4.1-4.2%; JOLTS hiring recovers above 5.2 million; major tech firms announce new hiring initiatives for AI roles in Q3-Q4.

Risks.

  • Data quality and coverage risk: Layoffs.fyi and similar trackers are incomplete; actual U.S. Information sector layoffs may differ significantly from tracked global tech figures

  • Geographic misallocation: Major company announcements (Amazon, Oracle, Meta) may be global cuts with <50% U.S. concentration, reducing impact on threshold

  • Timing execution risk: Announced layoffs may execute slowly across quarters or into 2027, reducing 2026 calendar year total

  • AI hiring offset: Companies cutting in some areas while aggressively hiring for AI/ML roles could result in lower net layoffs than gross announcements suggest

  • Geopolitical de-escalation: U.S.-Iran conflict could resolve quickly, collapsing oil prices and removing stagflation risk

  • Fed pivot risk: If growth deteriorates rapidly, Fed could cut more aggressively than currently signaled (dot plot shows only 1 cut), easing financial conditions

  • Recession probability is still only 30-50%: Base case may be sluggish growth rather than contraction, which would moderate layoff waves

  • 2025 baseline uncertainty: If 447k was an anomalous spike in 2025, reverting to more normal levels in 2026 (even if elevated) could stay below threshold

  • Measurement ambiguity: 'Information sector' BLS definition may not perfectly align with 'tech layoffs' as commonly understood—includes telecom, media, data processing

  • Market has stable price (86¢ 7-day range): suggests informed participants have conviction, and my contrarian view may be underweighting information they possess

Edge Assessment.

Modest negative edge, but within uncertainty bounds

Market probability: 87.25% My estimate: 78% Difference: -9.25 percentage points

Assessment: The market appears moderately overconfident. At 87.25%, the market is pricing this as near-certain, but meaningful uncertainty remains:

  1. Data visibility is poor: We're only 25% through 2026 with preliminary Q1 figures that may not reflect announced actions or properly segment U.S. Information sector

  2. Threshold is extremely high: 447k represents a severe 2025 baseline—exceeding it requires 2026 to be even worse, which is plausible but not 87% certain

  3. Conditional probabilities matter: My estimate implicitly weights:

    • 30-50% recession probability (not certain)
    • Unknown probability oil shock persists vs. resolves
    • Uncertain execution timing and geographic split of announced cuts
  4. However, market stability suggests information: The 7-day price range of 86¢-86¢ (essentially flat) suggests no new information is moving the market, and participants with deeper proprietary data (e.g., HR analytics firms, VC portfolio visibility) may have conviction supporting 87%.

Conclusion: There is likely a small edge in betting NO (taking the 13% side), but my confidence level is only 55%—not high enough to have strong conviction. The market may possess information about:

  • Proprietary layoff tracking data with better U.S. sector segmentation
  • Knowledge of additional unannounced layoffs in pipeline
  • Better visibility into 2025's actual 447k baseline composition

Recommendation: The edge exists but is marginal given uncertainty. If forced to bet, a small position on NO would be justified at current odds, but this is not a high-conviction opportunity. The true probability likely lies in the 75-82% range, and the market at 87% is modestly high but defensible given the severe macro deterioration observed in Q1 2026.

What Would Change Our Mind.

  • Release of Q2 2026 BLS data showing U.S. Information sector layoffs tracking above 150,000 by mid-year (suggesting 450k+ annual pace)

  • Oil prices sustaining above $110/barrel through June 2026 or Brent crude escalating above $125, confirming persistent stagflation scenario

  • Fed hiking rates at June or July 2026 FOMC meeting instead of delivering signaled cut, indicating more severe inflation/policy tightening

  • Wave of additional major tech company layoff announcements (5,000+ employees each) in Q2 2026 beyond already-announced cuts

  • U.S. GDP turning negative in Q2 2026, confirming recession has materialized within the 30-50% probability window

  • Unemployment rate rising above 4.7% by Q3 2026, indicating accelerating labor market deterioration

  • Conversely: Diplomatic breakthrough causing Brent crude to fall below $85/barrel by June, removing stagflation risk

  • Fed delivering 2+ rate cuts by September 2026 (exceeding dot plot guidance), easing financial conditions substantially

  • Proprietary layoff tracking data (e.g., Revelio Labs, Challenger Gray) showing Q1-Q2 2026 U.S. Information sector cuts tracking below 100,000

  • Major tech companies announcing significant AI/cloud hiring initiatives in Q2-Q3 that offset announced cuts

Sources.

Market History.

7-day range: 86¢ – 86¢.

Get This Via API.

Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.

curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/kalshi/TICKER/analyze \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"

Related Analysis.

economics
NO TRADE

Fed Interest Rate Increase of 25+ bps After April 2026 Meeting

Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, the probability of a 25+ bps Fed rate hike at the April 28-29 meeting is estimated at 1%, precisely matching the CME FedWatch market-implied probability. This represents near-universal consensus that a hike will NOT occur. The overwhelming evidence includes: (1) the March 17-18 FOMC dot plot showing zero of 12 participants projecting any rate increases in 2026, with median forecast indicating one 25 bps CUT by year-end; (2) the only dissent at the March meeting was Governor Miran voting for a CUT, not a hike; (3) Chair Powell's messaging emphasizing patience and viewing current 3.50%-3.75% rates as "sufficiently restrictive"; (4) inflation attributed to temporary supply shocks (tariffs, Middle East energy crisis) rather than demand overheating requiring tighter policy; and (5) the Fed having just completed a cutting cycle in late 2025, with historical precedent showing such pauses lead to holds or eventual cuts, not renewed tightening. Even the most hawkish mainstream analysts expect no hikes until 2027 at earliest. With only 39 days until the April meeting, there is insufficient time for the catastrophic inflation data that would be required to force a complete Fed policy reversal. The market is correctly priced with no identifiable edge.

1%Mar 20, 2026
economicskalshi
SELL

Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?

The market assigns a 58.5% probability that a U.S. District Court will find Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly, while our analysis estimates 52%—a modest 6.5 percentage point discrepancy. The FTC's case has survived two dismissal attempts and benefits from a lengthy discovery period and favorable precedent (DOJ v. Google Search), but three factors suggest the market may be overconfident in a government victory: (1) Settlement risk is substantial—historical antitrust cases of this magnitude settle 40-60% of the time, and any settlement would resolve NO since it avoids a court monopoly finding; (2) FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's less aggressive stance than predecessor Lina Khan may increase settlement pressure despite maintaining the case for 18+ months; (3) High evidentiary burdens at trial—surviving pleading-stage motions does not translate linearly to proving complex market definition and anticompetitive effects claims. Our scenario modeling assigns 35% probability to government trial victory, 33% to settlement (resolves NO), and 32% to Amazon trial victory. Confidence is low (0.45) due to significant information asymmetry: discovery evidence quality, settlement negotiation status, and Judge Chun's substantive views remain opaque to public markets. The 4-year timeline to 2030 resolution creates substantial intervening event risk.

52%Mar 24, 2026
economicskalshi
NO TRADE

Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?

The market prices FTC victory at 65%, while my analysis estimates 58% probability that Judge Chun will rule Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly. The FTC has strong procedural momentum: Judge Chun denied Amazon's motion to dismiss in September 2024 (a significant positive signal as most antitrust cases surviving this hurdle have elevated government success rates), and Amazon's $2.5 billion Prime settlement before the same judge in September 2025 suggests compelling internal discovery evidence and judicial receptiveness to government arguments about Amazon's practices. However, the market appears to overly discount critical risks. Market definition remains contested as evidenced by the March 7, 2026 economics hearing—if Amazon successfully argues the relevant market includes all retail (Walmart, Target, brick-and-mortar), its market share falls below monopoly thresholds and the case collapses regardless of conduct evidence. Historical base rates show ~50-60% government win rates in monopoly maintenance trials. While procedural strength justifies upward adjustment, the 65% market price exceeds what the evidence supports given ongoing market definition disputes, discovery still in progress through April 2026, and inherent unpredictability of bench trial outcomes. The 7-percentage-point gap represents a modest edge but meaningful mispricing.

58%Mar 29, 2026
Pipeline: 240.4sSources: 10View market

This analysis is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice. Market conditions change rapidly.