Will Ron DeSantis be Trump's next Attorney General?
Who will be Trump's next Attorney General?
Signal
NO TRADE
Probability
4%
Confidence
MEDIUM
65%
Summary.
The market prices DeSantis becoming Trump's next Attorney General at 3.15%, while my analysis estimates 4% probability—a negligible difference within the margin of uncertainty. As of May 10, 2026, Todd Blanche holds a strong incumbent advantage as Acting AG with Trump's explicit endorsement to use the role as an "audition," and Lee Zeldin is widely reported as the top outside contender. DeSantis faces multiple obstacles: his public denials (stating "I was never offered or asked for anything"), his spokesperson calling cabinet reports "fake rumors," sources indicating he prefers Defense Secretary or a Supreme Court seat, and his 2028 presidential ambitions that conflict with the politically risky AG role. The slight underpricing may reflect Trump's late-April comments that DeSantis was "begging" for the AG position and Trump's documented unpredictability, but the resolution criteria requiring DeSantis to be the first new AG (not just eventually appointed) makes this a low-probability outcome. Historical precedent strongly favors Acting AGs receiving formal nominations, and the weight of evidence points to Blanche or Zeldin being appointed first.
Reasoning.
Step-by-step Analysis (as of May 10, 2026)
Context: Pam Bondi was fired as AG on April 2, 2026. Todd Blanche became Acting AG immediately and is actively "auditioning" for permanent appointment. The question asks if Ron DeSantis will be the first new person appointed AG before January 20, 2029.
Key Evidence Against DeSantis as AG:
- Incumbent advantage: Todd Blanche is Acting AG and Trump explicitly told him to view this as a "tryout" - historical base rate strongly favors Acting AGs being nominated permanently
- DeSantis public denials: DeSantis stated "I was never offered or asked for anything" and his spokesperson called reports "fake rumors" (late April 2026)
- DeSantis preferences: Sources close to DeSantis indicate he prefers Defense Secretary or Supreme Court over AG
- 2028 presidential ambitions: DeSantis refuses to rule out 2028 run (May 5, 2026) - AG is historically a politically risky role that could damage presidential prospects
- Other frontrunner: Lee Zeldin (EPA Administrator) widely reported as top contender
- DeSantis gubernatorial term: Ends January 2027, creating timing complications
Key Evidence For DeSantis as AG:
- Trump's comments: Trump told confidants in late April that DeSantis was "begging" for AG role specifically
- Relationship thaw: Private lunch at Trump Doral on April 12, 2026 signals reconciliation after bitter 2024 primary
- Trump's unpredictability: History of sudden reversals and preference for high-profile loyalists
- Timeline: Nearly 3 years until resolution deadline (Jan 20, 2029) - if Blanche or Zeldin fail, DeSantis could still be option
Critical Resolution Criteria: DeSantis must be the FIRST new person appointed. If Blanche is formally nominated (even if later removed), or if Zeldin or anyone else is appointed first, the market resolves No.
Probability Assessment:
- Base case (85%): Todd Blanche gets formal nomination OR Lee Zeldin appointed → Market resolves No
- Alternative scenario (11%): Someone other than DeSantis but not Blanche/Zeldin appointed first → Market resolves No
- DeSantis scenario (4%): Trump bypasses Blanche despite "audition," overcomes DeSantis's public denials and political calculations, appoints DeSantis first → Market resolves Yes
The 3.15% market odds appear slightly underpriced given:
- Trump's unpredictability factor
- The specific mention of DeSantis "begging" for AG role
- Long resolution timeline (nearly 3 years) creates multiple scenarios
- DeSantis's non-categorical denial ("not entirely ruling out")
However, the weight of evidence strongly suggests Blanche (incumbent Acting AG with Trump's explicit endorsement) or Zeldin (widely reported frontrunner) will be appointed first. DeSantis's 2028 ambitions, public denials, stated preferences for other roles, and the historical rarity of bypassing an Acting AG all point to very low probability.
Estimated probability: 4% (vs market's 3.15%) - slight edge but within margin of uncertainty.
Key Factors.
Todd Blanche's incumbent advantage as Acting AG with explicit Trump endorsement for 'tryout'
DeSantis's public denials and spokesperson calling reports 'fake rumors' (late April 2026)
DeSantis's stated preference for Defense Secretary or Supreme Court over AG role
DeSantis's 2028 presidential ambitions conflict with politically risky AG position
Resolution criteria requires DeSantis to be FIRST new AG - any prior appointment resolves to No
Lee Zeldin widely reported as top outside contender for permanent AG role
Historical base rate strongly favors Acting AGs receiving formal nomination
Trump's unpredictability and history of sudden reversals creates non-zero probability
Nearly 3-year resolution timeline allows for multiple scenario changes
Scenarios.
Base case: Blanche or Zeldin appointed first
85%Todd Blanche successfully completes his 'audition' and receives formal nomination, OR Lee Zeldin is selected as the top outside contender. Either way, someone other than DeSantis becomes the first new AG after Bondi, resolving the market to No. This aligns with historical precedent favoring Acting AGs and current reporting on frontrunners.
Trigger: Formal nomination announcement for Blanche or Zeldin within next 1-3 months; continued aggressive prosecutorial actions by Blanche that please Trump; Zeldin gaining momentum in Trump's inner circle discussions
DeSantis overcomes obstacles and is appointed first
4%Trump's April comments about DeSantis 'begging' for AG prove accurate. Trump decides Blanche is insufficiently loyal or effective, bypasses Zeldin, and offers AG to DeSantis. DeSantis reverses his public denials, abandons 2028 presidential ambitions (or views AG as helpful stepping stone), and accepts. He becomes the first new AG appointed after Bondi's firing.
Trigger: Blanche makes misstep that angers Trump; increased Trump-DeSantis meetings/communication; DeSantis signals shifting away from 2028 run; reporting of formal AG offer to DeSantis; DeSantis resignation as Florida governor (term ends Jan 2027 anyway)
Musical chairs: Multiple AGs, DeSantis appointed later
11%Blanche or Zeldin is appointed first (resolving market to No), but is subsequently fired. Trump then cycles through other candidates. DeSantis could still become AG eventually, but he would NOT be the FIRST new person after Bondi, so market still resolves No. This scenario captures Trump's history of high AG turnover.
Trigger: First AG appointment (Blanche/Zeldin/other) announced; subsequent firing or resignation within months; DeSantis floated again as replacement after initial appointment
Risks.
Trump's comments to confidants may be more reliable than DeSantis's public denials (politicians often deny positions before accepting)
The April 12 Trump-DeSantis lunch could signal a deal already in place, with public denials as political theater
Blanche could make a major misstep in coming weeks that disqualifies him despite current frontrunner status
DeSantis's calculation could shift if 2028 presidential path looks blocked (e.g., Trump endorses someone else early)
Information asymmetry: Trump inner circle may know of concrete DeSantis offer not yet public
Underestimating Trump's preference for high-profile loyalists over experienced insiders
Overweighting DeSantis's public statements when he stopped short of categorical 'no'
Cabinet speculation is highly fluid - reporting from May 10, 2026 could be outdated within days
Historical base rates may not apply to Trump's unconventional decision-making process
Edge Assessment.
Minimal edge. My estimate of 4% vs market's 3.15% represents only 0.85 percentage points difference - within the margin of uncertainty for this type of political prediction.
The market appears reasonably calibrated. The low probability correctly reflects that DeSantis faces multiple obstacles: incumbent Acting AG with Trump's endorsement, DeSantis's public denials, his 2028 ambitions, his stated preference for other roles, and historical precedent against bypassing Acting AGs.
The slight underpricing (if real) stems from: (1) Trump's specific mention of DeSantis "begging" for AG role, (2) Trump's unpredictability, (3) the long 3-year resolution window creating more scenarios, and (4) DeSantis's non-categorical denial.
However, at these low probabilities (3-4%), the difference is not actionable. No clear edge exists. Would need the market to be pricing DeSantis below 2% or above 7% to justify strong conviction in either direction. The 3.15% market price appears fair given available information as of May 10, 2026.
What Would Change Our Mind.
Trump announces formal AG nomination for Todd Blanche or Lee Zeldin (would lower DeSantis probability to <1%)
Blanche makes major prosecutorial misstep that visibly angers Trump in next 2-4 weeks (would raise DeSantis probability to 8-12%)
DeSantis makes definitive categorical statement ruling out any Trump administration role (would lower to <2%)
Credible reporting emerges of formal AG offer extended to DeSantis with acceptance timeline (would raise to 15-25%)
DeSantis announces he will not pursue 2028 presidential run (would raise to 7-10%)
Multiple Trump-DeSantis meetings occur within short timeframe with confirmed discussion of AG role (would raise to 10-15%)
Market odds move below 1.5% or above 6% creating meaningful divergence from estimated probability
Sources.
- Axios: Trump tells confidants DeSantis 'begging' for administration job
- Politico: Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after two months
- DeSantis spokesperson: Cabinet job reports are 'fake rumors'
- Milken Institute: DeSantis refuses to rule out 2028 presidential run
- Washington Post: Todd Blanche uses Acting AG role as audition for permanent position
- NYT: Lee Zeldin emerges as top contender for Attorney General
- Private Trump-DeSantis lunch at Mar-a-Lago signals thaw in relationship
Get This Via API.
Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.
curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/kalshi/TICKER/analyze \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Related Analysis.
Will Republicans win the House in 2026?
The current market price of 0.145 seems very low. While predicting elections so far out is difficult, historical trends and incumbency advantage suggest Republicans have a much higher chance than that, though economic factors and potential shifts in national mood are significant risks. I recommend a BUY.
Will Republicans win the House in 2026?
The market prices Republican House retention at 14.5%, implying an 85.5% probability of Democratic takeover in November 2026. My analysis estimates Republican retention at approximately 12% (Democratic takeover at 88%), representing marginal agreement with market pricing. The consensus reflects strong fundamentals: Republicans hold only a 4-seat majority requiring minimal Democratic gains, historical midterm penalties average 25-28 seat losses for the president's party, economic conditions are deteriorating (March 2026 CPI spiked to 3.3% with 21.2% gasoline price increases), the Federal Reserve maintains a "higher for longer" stance pushing relief to 2027, and generic ballot polling shows Democrats +3. The market has moved decisively from 43% Republican odds in late 2025 to current levels, incorporating fresh economic data released April 10, 2026. While 7 months remain for potential shifts in inflation, geopolitics, or campaign dynamics, current trajectory strongly favors Democrats. My 12% estimate versus the market's 14.5% represents only a 2.5 percentage point difference—well within uncertainty bounds and insufficient to constitute actionable edge. Multiple prediction platforms converge near 85% Democratic odds with stable pricing, suggesting market efficiency.
Will Democrats win the House in 2026?
The market prices Democrats winning the 2026 House at 85.5%, while my independent analysis estimates 82%—a small difference within normal calibration uncertainty. Both assessments strongly favor Democratic control based on compelling fundamentals: Democrats need only 3 net seats from the current 220-215 GOP majority, generic ballot polling shows a consistent D+4 to D+5 lead across multiple high-quality sources as of April 2026, and critical redistricting developments provide structural advantages (Virginia's constitutional amendment passed April 21, 2026 projects 10 of 11 seats for Democrats; California's Proposition 50 estimates 3-5 additional Democratic seats). Historical midterm patterns show the incumbent president's party loses House seats in 90% of elections. My slightly more conservative estimate (82% vs market's 85.5%) reflects temporal uncertainty—the election is 6.5 months away, allowing time for economic shocks, geopolitical events, or political environment shifts—plus implementation risks around redistricting and potential tail risks that may warrant an 18% (rather than 14.5%) probability for GOP retention. The market appears well-informed and efficient, with strong consensus across forecasting models (71-85% range) validating the signal strength.