economics

kalshiMarch 13, 202613d ago

Will Ali Asghar Hejazi be the next Supreme Leader of Iran?

View on kalshi

Signal

SELL

Probability

Market: 1%Edge: -1pp

Confidence

HIGH

100%

Summary.

The market is pricing Ali Asghar Hejazi's odds of becoming Iran's next Supreme Leader at 1%, while our analysis estimates the true probability at 0%. This is not a close call: the succession has already occurred. On March 9, 2026, the Assembly of Experts selected Mojtaba Khamenei as Supreme Leader following Ali Khamenei's assassination on February 28. The bet's resolution criteria explicitly ask whether "the first new person to hold the position of Supreme Leader after issuance" is Hejazi—and that person is definitively Mojtaba Khamenei. Additionally, Hejazi himself was reportedly killed or critically wounded in an Israeli airstrike on March 6, 2026, three days before the succession. Multiple independent intelligence sources confirm these facts, and other prediction markets universally price this outcome at ~0%. The 1% market odds likely reflect minimum platform tick sizes and residual liquidity rather than genuine probability. While a 1% theoretical edge exists, it is not practically exploitable given the small absolute spread, liquidity constraints, and the fact that formal settlement may not occur until the 2045 resolution date.

Reasoning.

This bet is effectively resolved. Here's the step-by-step analysis:

TEMPORAL GROUNDING (March 13, 2026):

February 28, 2026: Ali Khamenei killed in U.S.-Israeli airstrike
March 6, 2026: Ali Asghar Hejazi targeted in Israeli airstrike, reported dead or critically wounded
March 9, 2026: Assembly of Experts selected Mojtaba Khamenei as new Supreme Leader
March 13, 2026 (TODAY): Analyzing whether Hejazi will be "next" Supreme Leader

RESOLUTION CRITERIA ANALYSIS: The bet asks: "Will Ali Asghar Hejazi be the NEXT Supreme Leader of Iran?" with resolution criteria stating: "If the first new person to hold the position of Supreme Leader of Iran after Issuance is Ali Asghar Hejazi, then the market resolves to Yes."

CRITICAL FACTS:

The succession has ALREADY occurred - Mojtaba Khamenei was officially appointed on March 9, 2026
The "first new person to hold the position after issuance" is definitively NOT Hejazi - it is Mojtaba Khamenei
Hejazi himself is reported dead or critically wounded from the March 6 airstrike
Multiple intelligence sources and prediction markets confirm these facts with near-certainty

PROBABILITY ASSESSMENT: The probability is 0.0% for the following reasons:

Succession already completed: The "next" Supreme Leader has been determined - it's Mojtaba Khamenei
Hejazi incapacitated/dead: Even if there were another succession event, Hejazi cannot serve
Market consensus at 0.01 (1%) appears to reflect residual liquidity/rounding rather than genuine probability

THEORETICAL EDGE CASE (Does not change answer): Could Mojtaba be deposed and Hejazi somehow appointed? No:

Hejazi is reported dead/critically wounded
Even if Mojtaba were removed, the bet asks about the "first new person" after issuance, which has already been determined
The resolution criteria are unambiguous

MARKET PRICING: Current odds of 0.01 (1%) are generous relative to true probability of 0%. The 1¢-2¢ range likely reflects:

Minimum tick sizes on prediction market platforms
Speculative/misinformed retail flow
Market makers providing minimal liquidity

This is not a monetary policy question - it's a geopolitical succession bet that has already resolved in all but formal settlement.

Key Factors.

Succession already completed: Mojtaba Khamenei appointed Supreme Leader on March 9, 2026
Resolution criteria unambiguous: Asks about 'first new person to hold position after issuance' - that is Mojtaba, not Hejazi
Hejazi incapacitated or dead: Targeted in March 6, 2026 Israeli airstrike per multiple intelligence sources
Market consensus correct: Prediction markets universally price Hejazi odds at ~0% (0.01), Mojtaba at 100%
No path to Yes resolution: Even if Mojtaba were deposed, succession has already occurred with first new leader determined
Time renders bet moot: Question asks about 'next' leader, but next leader has already been appointed

Scenarios.

Base Case: Bet Resolves No (Mojtaba Succession Complete)

100%

Mojtaba Khamenei remains Supreme Leader. The bet resolution criteria are clear: the 'first new person to hold the position after issuance' is Mojtaba Khamenei, not Hejazi. The bet resolves to No when formally settled. Hejazi remains dead or incapacitated.

Trigger: No additional evidence needed - succession already occurred March 9, 2026. Formal bet settlement by platform when reviewed or at 2045 resolution date.

Administrative Case: Settles at Last Traded Price

Per resolution criteria note: 'If the current Supreme Leader dies before a new leader is appointed, the market settles to last traded price.' This might be misapplied if platforms interpret Mojtaba's potential death/removal as triggering this clause before formal resolution review, causing settlement at ~1¢ rather than proper No resolution.

Trigger: Platform administrative confusion or generous interpretation of unclear succession scenarios. Mojtaba faces challenges from clerics, creating ambiguity about legitimacy.

Impossible Case: Hejazi Becomes Supreme Leader

This scenario is impossible. Hejazi is reported dead or critically wounded from March 6 airstrike. Even if he survived, the succession already occurred - Mojtaba was appointed March 9. The resolution criteria ask about the 'first new person' after issuance, which is definitively Mojtaba, not any subsequent successor.

Trigger: Would require: (1) Hejazi resurrection/recovery, (2) Time travel to undo March 9 succession, (3) Complete intelligence failure across all sources. Probability rounds to 0%.

Risks.

Intelligence errors: All sources could be wrong about Hejazi's death/incapacitation and Mojtaba succession (extremely unlikely given multiple independent confirmations)
Resolution criteria misinterpretation: Platform could misread criteria in unprecedented way, though language is clear
Administrative settlement error: Platform might settle at last traded price due to confusion about succession legitimacy challenges
Unknown unknowns: In wartime conditions with rapid leadership changes, information could be systematically wrong, though multiple sources confirm key facts
Mojtaba removal creates ambiguity: If Mojtaba is deposed before formal bet review, platforms might misapply 'dies before appointment' clause despite clear succession having occurred

Edge Assessment.

STRONG EDGE TO FADE (sell/short): Market odds of 0.01 (1%) significantly overestimate the true probability of 0%. However, practical edge is limited by:

Market already correct directionally: 1% vs 0% is small absolute difference
Liquidity constraints: Bet likely has minimal volume at 1¢; selling may be difficult
Opportunity cost: Capital tied up until formal settlement (potentially until 2045 resolution date per criteria) for 1¢ per contract profit
Platform risk: Early settlement mechanisms unclear; might settle at last traded price

RECOMMENDATION: This bet should resolve No with near-certainty. The 1% market odds appear to reflect minimum tick sizes and residual speculative flow rather than genuine probability. Edge exists but is not practically exploitable for meaningful profit given the small spread (0% vs 1%) and long time until formal resolution.

NOTE: This analysis is NOT about Federal Reserve monetary policy. The bet concerns Iranian succession, which has already occurred. The economic data in research (CPI, PCE, employment, Fed funds) is irrelevant to this bet's resolution.

What Would Change Our Mind.

Credible intelligence showing Hejazi survived the March 6 airstrike and remains viable for leadership (would still not change bet outcome since succession already occurred)
Evidence that Mojtaba Khamenei's March 9 appointment was illegitimate or reversed by Assembly of Experts AND Hejazi was subsequently appointed (extremely unlikely)
Platform clarification that bet refers to 'next succession event' rather than 'first new person after issuance' as written in criteria (would require complete reinterpretation of stated rules)
Discovery that all reporting about March 9 succession is false and no new Supreme Leader has actually been appointed (would contradict multiple independent sources)
Evidence of systematic intelligence failure across all Western and regional sources regarding Iranian succession events (unprecedented scenario)

Sources.

Market History.

7-day range: 1¢ – 2¢.

Get This Via API.

Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.

curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/analyze \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"category": "economics", "platform": "kalshi"}'

Get API Key Read Docs

Related Analysis.

economics

SELL

Bitcoin reaches $90,000 in March 2026

Based on temporal grounding as of March 20, 2026, this bet has an estimated probability of approximately 2% compared to any market pricing above 5% representing significant mispricing. Bitcoin currently trades at $70,650 and requires a 27% gain to reach $90,000 within just 11 remaining days—a historically rare move that becomes virtually unprecedented given the hostile current environment. Bitcoin already failed to breach $90,000 during March, with the monthly high reaching only $76,000 before the March 18 Fed meeting triggered a 4% selloff. The macro backdrop has severely deteriorated: the Fed maintained hawkish policy at 3.50%-3.75% with sticky inflation (Core PCE 2.8%, February PPI +0.7%), Iran strikes sent oil to $119/barrel adding inflationary pressure, and $158 million in leveraged longs were liquidated. Derivatives positioning is overwhelmingly defensive (put-call ratio at 0.77, highest since mid-2021; funding rates collapsed from 4.1% to 2.7%). No identifiable catalyst exists to drive the required breakout within 11 days. While ETF inflows of $1.3 billion showed some institutional interest, this proved insufficient to break the established $60K-$72K range. The confluence of severe time constraint, hawkish monetary policy, geopolitical energy shocks, bearish market structure, and absence of positive catalysts makes a 27% rally extraordinarily unlikely, justifying the low 2% probability estimate with high confidence (92%).

2%Mar 20, 2026

economics

NO TRADE

Bitcoin to reach $90,000 in March 2026

Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, I estimate an 8% probability that Bitcoin will reach $90,000 before March 31, 2026 (confidence level: 82%). This is a low-probability tail event requiring a 22-29% price surge in just 11 days from the current $70,000-$74,000 trading range. Bitcoin's March 17 peak of $76,000 fell $14,000 short of target and has since consolidated lower, signaling momentum weakness. The March 17-18 FOMC delivered a hawkish shock—cutting 2026 rate expectations to just one cut and raising inflation forecasts to 2.7%—creating a hostile macro environment for speculative assets. Multiple technical resistance levels ($75k-$78.9k, then $83k) must be breached in rapid succession without time for consolidation. Historically, 25%+ Bitcoin moves in 11-day periods are extremely rare outside peak bull euphoria or major catalytic events, neither of which are currently present. While $700M in ETF inflows and MicroStrategy's $1.6B purchase demonstrate strong institutional demand, this pace is insufficient to drive the required parabolic move. The primary risk to this assessment is a black swan positive catalyst (major institutional adoption announcement, regulatory breakthrough, or geopolitical de-escalation) that could trigger FOMO-driven momentum. Without market odds provided, I cannot determine if an exploitable edge exists, but probabilities above 15% would likely represent overvaluation.

8%Mar 20, 2026

economics

NO TRADE

Fed interest rate decrease at next meeting

The market-implied probability of a Fed rate cut at the March 18, 2026 meeting is 3-4% across multiple sources (CME FedWatch >90% no change, Investing.com 97% no change, Polymarket 96% no change). My estimated probability of 4% is essentially identical to market consensus. This alignment reflects appropriate assessment of current conditions: PCE inflation remains elevated at 2.9% (well above the Fed's 2% target), the labor market is strong with 4.3% unemployment, the Fed characterized economic activity as "expanding at solid pace" in January, and only 2 of 12 FOMC members dissented in favor of cuts. While Q4 GDP slowed to 1.4% and inflation trends are improving (CPI at 2.4%), these factors are insufficient to justify immediate action with only 3-4 weeks until the meeting. The Fed is highly predictable at this short horizon, and the overwhelming market consensus reflects proper calibration rather than mispricing. No meaningful edge exists at current odds.

4%Feb 22, 2026