Will Trump be impeached and removed from office?
Will Trump be impeached and removed from office before his term ends?
Signal
NO TRADE
Probability
18%
Confidence
MEDIUM
55%
Summary.
The market prices a 22% probability that Trump will be both impeached and removed from office before January 20, 2029, while my analysis estimates an 18% probability—a modest 4 percentage point difference. The market appears to slightly overprice removal likelihood given the insurmountable historical and constitutional barriers: no president has ever been convicted and removed by the Senate, and achieving the required 67-vote supermajority would need 15-20+ Republican defectors despite Trump's second impeachment (post-Capitol riot) only securing 7 GOP votes. While prediction markets show an 84% chance Democrats flip the House in November 2026 (enabling likely impeachment) and 72% odds of impeachment-only by 2028, the gap between impeachment and actual removal remains vast. Current administration scandals (DHS Secretary Noem's resignation amid fraud charges, AG Bondi's Epstein files controversy) are serious but lack the "smoking gun" quality of Watergate tapes. Critically, economic resilience—2.4% GDP growth, 4.4% unemployment, and moderate inflation—reduces the probability of an economic crisis that historically drives partisan realignment. The market's implied 31% conditional probability of Senate conviction given impeachment (0.22/0.72) seems optimistic relative to constitutional reality, though the 34-month timeline does allow for unforeseen catastrophic scandals or geopolitical/economic shocks that could fundamentally alter Republican senator calculations.
Reasoning.
Step-by-Step Analysis:
1. Historical Base Rate Context: The base rate for presidential removal is 0% across all US history. No president has ever been convicted and removed by the Senate. Trump was impeached twice (2019, 2021) with Senate votes of 52-48 and 57-43 - both far short of the 67-vote supermajority threshold. The closest historical analogue is Nixon (1974), who resigned before formal votes when Republican Senate support collapsed.
2. Constitutional Barriers: Removal requires both House impeachment (simple majority) AND Senate conviction (67 votes, or 2/3 supermajority). This is an extraordinarily high bar. Even with maximum bipartisan support in Trump's second impeachment (57 votes including 7 Republicans), the threshold was missed by 10 votes.
3. Current Political Landscape (March 27, 2026):
- House is Republican-controlled; 140 Democrats voted for impeachment in December 2025 but leadership acknowledged futility with GOP Senate
- Prediction markets show 84% probability Democrats flip House in November 2026 midterms (7+ months away)
- Multiple administration scandals: DHS Secretary Noem resigned amid fraud/bribery; AG Bondi facing bipartisan backlash over Epstein files
- House impeachment odds before midterms: 57%; impeachment-only odds by 2028: 72%
4. Senate Math Problem: The research doesn't specify current Senate composition, but historically Republicans would need 15-20+ defections to reach 67 votes (assuming 50-53 Republican senators). Even in Trump's most vulnerable moment (Jan 2021 post-Capitol riot), only 7 Republicans voted to convict. Getting to 67 requires either:
- Massive Democratic Senate gains in 2026/2028 midterms + some GOP defections, OR
- Catastrophic scandal causing 15-20+ Republican senators to abandon Trump
5. Economic Context: The economy shows resilience: 2.4% GDP growth forecast, 4.4% unemployment, moderate 2.4% inflation (though Fed revised PCE up to 2.7%). This economic stability REDUCES likelihood of removal - economic crises historically drive political realignment (see Nixon + 1974 stagflation). AI infrastructure investment offsetting tariff drag. A strong economy means scandals alone must carry removal pressure.
6. Scandal Trajectory Assessment: Current scandals (Noem fraud/lying to Congress, Bondi/Epstein files) are serious but not yet at "smoking gun" Watergate-tape level. To reach 67 Senate votes, we'd need scandals that directly implicate Trump in criminal conduct with irrefutable evidence + economic/geopolitical crisis.
7. Timeline Considerations: Resolution date is Jan 20, 2029 (34 months away). Key inflection points:
- Before Nov 2026 midterms: Low probability (GOP controls both chambers)
- Post-Nov 2026 midterms: If Dems flip House (84% likely), impeachment probability jumps to ~72%, but Senate conviction still requires massive GOP defection
- 2028 post-election: New Senate composition could change math
8. Market Pricing Analysis: Market shows 22% for impeachment AND removal vs 72% for impeachment-only. This implies ~31% conditional probability of Senate conviction given House impeachment (0.22/0.72 ≈ 0.305). This conditional probability seems slightly HIGH given:
- 0% historical success rate
- Need for 15-20+ Republican defectors
- Economic resilience reducing pressure
- 34-month timeline allowing scandal fatigue
9. My Estimate: I estimate 18% probability of impeachment AND removal before Jan 20, 2029. This reflects:
- ~65% probability of House impeachment at some point (lower than market's 72% - I see some Democratic strategic hesitation)
- ~28% conditional probability of Senate conviction given impeachment (slightly lower than market's implied 31%)
- The combination yields ~18% (0.65 × 0.28 ≈ 0.18)
This is 4 percentage points below the market's 22%, suggesting the market may be slightly overpricing removal likelihood given constitutional barriers and economic resilience.
Key Factors.
Constitutional supermajority requirement: 67 Senate votes creates extraordinarily high bar with 0% historical success rate
November 2026 midterm results: 84% probability of Democratic House flip would enable impeachment articles, but Senate conviction is separate challenge
Scandal severity and evidence quality: Current scandals (Noem fraud, Bondi/Epstein files) serious but not yet 'Watergate tapes' level of irrefutable Trump implication
Economic resilience: 2.4% GDP growth, 4.4% unemployment, and moderate inflation reduce likelihood of economic crisis that historically drives Republican defections
Republican Senate cohesion: Need 15-20+ Republican defectors to reach 67 votes; Trump's second impeachment only got 7 GOP votes even post-Capitol riot
Timeline length: 34 months until Jan 20, 2029 allows for multiple inflection points but also scandal fatigue and political repositioning
Market pricing inefficiency: Implied 31% conditional probability of conviction given impeachment seems high relative to historical precedent and constitutional barriers
Scenarios.
Base Case: Impeachment Without Removal
47%Democrats flip House in November 2026 midterms (84% likely per markets) and impeach Trump in 2027 on articles related to administration scandals (Noem fraud, Bondi misconduct, or new revelations). The impeachment passes House along party lines. Senate trial occurs but conviction falls short of 67 votes, with only 5-10 Republican defections. Trump remains in office through Jan 20, 2029.
Trigger: Democratic House majority post-Nov 2026; continued drip of administration scandals but no single 'smoking gun'; Republican senators face primary pressure to remain loyal; economy stays resilient at 2-3% growth; Trump approval among Republicans remains above 70%
Bull Case (for removal): Catastrophic Scandal + Economic Crisis
18%A major scandal directly implicating Trump emerges (financial corruption with hard evidence, abuse of power with bipartisan victim, or DOJ obstruction proven) combined with economic deterioration. US-Iran conflict escalates causing sustained energy crisis and recession. Unemployment rises to 6-7%, inflation spikes above 4%, GDP contracts. Republican senators face constituent anger over economic conditions and abandon Trump. Senate conviction reaches 67+ votes in 2027-2028.
Trigger: Irrefutable evidence of Trump criminality (recordings, documents, bipartisan witness testimony); GDP contraction for 2+ quarters; unemployment above 6%; energy crisis from prolonged Middle East war; Trump approval falls below 35% overall and below 60% among Republicans; 15-20+ GOP senators publicly signal openness to conviction
Bear Case (for removal): Republican Resilience
35%Either Republicans retain House in 2026 midterms (16% probability per markets), preventing impeachment entirely, OR Democrats impeach post-midterms but Senate Republicans hold firm with fewer than 5 defections. Economy remains stable at 2-3% growth. Existing scandals (Noem, Bondi) fade from news cycle. No new major scandals emerge. Trump's populist base remains energized. Senate conviction never seriously threatens 67-vote threshold.
Trigger: GOP retains House in surprise 2026 outcome; OR Democratic impeachment receives fewer than 60 Senate votes; economy continues 2%+ growth; unemployment stays below 5%; Trump maintains 75%+ approval among Republican voters; primary challenges intimidate potential GOP defectors; scandal fatigue sets in
Risks.
Unknown Senate composition: Research doesn't specify current Senate breakdown or how many Republican defections needed - could be fewer if Democrats gained Senate seats
Unpredictable scandal trajectory: Major revelations (DOJ documents, financial records, witness flips) could rapidly shift Republican senator calculus
Geopolitical wild cards: US-Iran conflict escalation could trigger economic crisis (oil shock, recession) that historically breaks partisan loyalties
2028 election dynamics: If Trump becomes lame duck post-2028 election with successor chosen, GOP senators may calculate removal differently
Underestimating partisan polarization: Modern polarization may make 67-vote threshold even harder than historical precedent suggests
Overestimating scandal impact: In current media environment, scandals may not penetrate partisan information bubbles as effectively as pre-internet era
Legal jeopardy creating pressure: Potential criminal prosecutions or convictions (not mentioned in research) could create additional removal pressure
Health or capacity issues: Unexpected developments regarding presidential fitness could change removal calculus entirely
Edge Assessment.
WEAK EDGE - SLIGHT UNDERBET ON 'NO'
My estimated probability of removal is 18% vs market's 22%, a 4 percentage point difference. This suggests the market is slightly overpricing removal likelihood, but the edge is not strong enough to warrant high confidence.
Arguments for market being too high (supporting my 18% estimate):
- Historical base rate is 0% for removal - the constitutional bar has NEVER been cleared
- Economic resilience (2.4% GDP growth, 4.4% unemployment) reduces probability of crisis that could turn Republican senators
- Current scandals haven't directly implicated Trump with "smoking gun" evidence like Nixon tapes
- Even in Trump's most vulnerable moment (Jan 2021), only 7 Republicans voted to convict - need 15-20+ defectors
- Implied conditional probability of 31% conviction given impeachment seems high relative to structural barriers
Arguments for market being correct (risks to my analysis):
- 34-month timeline provides multiple opportunities for catastrophic scandal revelations
- Unprecedented third impeachment scenario lacks clear historical analogue
- US-Iran conflict and partial government shutdown suggest higher political chaos/volatility than typical
- Market aggregates diverse information sources and has been relatively well-calibrated on political events
- Senate composition unknown - if Democrats made gains, 67-vote threshold could be more achievable
Recommendation: If forced to bet, I'd lean toward 'NO' (Trump not removed) at current 22% odds, but position sizing should be small given moderate confidence (0.55). The 4-point edge isn't large enough to justify strong conviction. Key monitoring: November 2026 midterm results, any major scandal developments, economic trajectory, and Republican senator public statements on Trump. I'd only increase position size if odds rose above 28-30% without corresponding scandal escalation.
What Would Change Our Mind.
November 2026 midterm results showing Democrats gaining 8+ Senate seats, dramatically reducing the number of Republican defectors needed to reach 67 votes
Emergence of irrefutable evidence directly implicating Trump in criminal conduct (authenticated recordings, documents, or bipartisan witness testimony comparable to Watergate tapes)
Economic deterioration with GDP contracting for 2+ consecutive quarters, unemployment rising above 6%, or sustained energy crisis from Middle East conflict escalation
10+ Republican senators publicly signaling openness to conviction or Trump's approval rating falling below 60% among Republican voters
Major legal developments such as criminal conviction in federal or state court creating additional political pressure for removal
Market odds rising above 28-30% without corresponding material scandal developments, suggesting mispricing has increased
Revelation of current Senate composition showing Democrats already hold 55+ seats, making 67-vote threshold more mathematically achievable
Trump becoming a lame duck after 2028 election with Republican successor already chosen, changing GOP senator political calculus on removal costs
Sources.
- Kalshi Prediction Markets - Trump Impeachment Odds
- Fed Chair Powell Press Conference - March 18, 2026
- Powell Speech - Paul A. Volcker Public Integrity Award - March 21, 2026
- BLS Consumer Price Index - February 2026
- BLS Employment Situation - February 2026
- Congressional Action on Impeachment - December 2025
- Homeland Security Secretary Noem Resignation - March 2026
- Goldman Sachs US GDP Forecast 2026
- S&P Global US Economic Outlook 2026
- FOMC Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) - March 2026
- FOMC Statement and Vote - March 17-18, 2026
Get This Via API.
Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.
curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/kalshi/TICKER/analyze \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Related Analysis.
Fed Interest Rate Increase of 25+ bps After April 2026 Meeting
Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, the probability of a 25+ bps Fed rate hike at the April 28-29 meeting is estimated at 1%, precisely matching the CME FedWatch market-implied probability. This represents near-universal consensus that a hike will NOT occur. The overwhelming evidence includes: (1) the March 17-18 FOMC dot plot showing zero of 12 participants projecting any rate increases in 2026, with median forecast indicating one 25 bps CUT by year-end; (2) the only dissent at the March meeting was Governor Miran voting for a CUT, not a hike; (3) Chair Powell's messaging emphasizing patience and viewing current 3.50%-3.75% rates as "sufficiently restrictive"; (4) inflation attributed to temporary supply shocks (tariffs, Middle East energy crisis) rather than demand overheating requiring tighter policy; and (5) the Fed having just completed a cutting cycle in late 2025, with historical precedent showing such pauses lead to holds or eventual cuts, not renewed tightening. Even the most hawkish mainstream analysts expect no hikes until 2027 at earliest. With only 39 days until the April meeting, there is insufficient time for the catastrophic inflation data that would be required to force a complete Fed policy reversal. The market is correctly priced with no identifiable edge.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market assigns a 58.5% probability that a U.S. District Court will find Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly, while our analysis estimates 52%—a modest 6.5 percentage point discrepancy. The FTC's case has survived two dismissal attempts and benefits from a lengthy discovery period and favorable precedent (DOJ v. Google Search), but three factors suggest the market may be overconfident in a government victory: (1) Settlement risk is substantial—historical antitrust cases of this magnitude settle 40-60% of the time, and any settlement would resolve NO since it avoids a court monopoly finding; (2) FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's less aggressive stance than predecessor Lina Khan may increase settlement pressure despite maintaining the case for 18+ months; (3) High evidentiary burdens at trial—surviving pleading-stage motions does not translate linearly to proving complex market definition and anticompetitive effects claims. Our scenario modeling assigns 35% probability to government trial victory, 33% to settlement (resolves NO), and 32% to Amazon trial victory. Confidence is low (0.45) due to significant information asymmetry: discovery evidence quality, settlement negotiation status, and Judge Chun's substantive views remain opaque to public markets. The 4-year timeline to 2030 resolution creates substantial intervening event risk.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market prices FTC victory at 65%, while my analysis estimates 58% probability that Judge Chun will rule Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly. The FTC has strong procedural momentum: Judge Chun denied Amazon's motion to dismiss in September 2024 (a significant positive signal as most antitrust cases surviving this hurdle have elevated government success rates), and Amazon's $2.5 billion Prime settlement before the same judge in September 2025 suggests compelling internal discovery evidence and judicial receptiveness to government arguments about Amazon's practices. However, the market appears to overly discount critical risks. Market definition remains contested as evidenced by the March 7, 2026 economics hearing—if Amazon successfully argues the relevant market includes all retail (Walmart, Target, brick-and-mortar), its market share falls below monopoly thresholds and the case collapses regardless of conduct evidence. Historical base rates show ~50-60% government win rates in monopoly maintenance trials. While procedural strength justifies upward adjustment, the 65% market price exceeds what the evidence supports given ongoing market definition disputes, discovery still in progress through April 2026, and inherent unpredictability of bench trial outcomes. The 7-percentage-point gap represents a modest edge but meaningful mispricing.