rekko.ai
economicskalshi logokalshiMarch 28, 20265d ago

Will Trump be impeached and removed from office?

Will Trump be impeached and removed from office before his term ends?

Resolves Jan 20, 2029, 3:00 PM UTC

Signal

NO TRADE

Probability

18%

Market: 22%Edge: -4pp

Confidence

MEDIUM

65%

Summary.

The market prices Trump's impeachment AND Senate conviction at 22%, while my analysis estimates 18%. The 4-percentage-point gap stems from the market potentially underweighting the constitutional near-impossibility of securing 67 Senate votes for conviction. Historical base rate strongly anchors against conviction: zero presidents have ever been removed via this process in U.S. history. While Democrats have an 84% probability of flipping the House in November 2026—making impeachment highly likely in 2027-2028—conviction requires 16-17 Republican senators to defect, with zero precedent for such cross-party voting. Even Trump's 2021 impeachment achieved only 7 Republican votes maximum. Current crises (Iran war entering week 4, partial government shutdown, 60% disapproval ratings) create political pressure but appear insufficient to overcome the constitutional supermajority barrier. The market's 22% pricing may overestimate how tail-risk crisis scenarios could break Republican loyalty, though the long time horizon (until January 2029) and unprecedented combination of simultaneous crises warrant non-trivial probability above historical base rates.

Reasoning.

Step-by-Step Analysis

Historical Base Rate Context: The base rate for presidential impeachment AND conviction is 0% - no U.S. president has ever been removed from office through this process in 250+ years of history. All 4 impeachments (Johnson, Clinton, Trump 2019, Trump 2021) resulted in Senate acquittal. This creates an extremely high prior against conviction.

Current Political Environment (March 28, 2026):

  1. Narrow Republican Control: GOP holds 218-214 House majority and 53-47 Senate majority
  2. Active Crises: 4-week Iran military conflict, partial government shutdown, controversial executive orders
  3. Public Opinion: ~60% disapproval on war/economy handling; 1M+ signatures for removal
  4. Market Divergence: 70% probability of impeachment alone vs. 22% for impeachment AND conviction

Path to Impeachment:

  • Current Republican House: Very unlikely to impeach (2-4% by June 2026, 12-14% by year-end)
  • Post-Midterm Democratic House: Highly likely (84% probability Dems flip House in November 2026)
  • Democrats need only net +4 seats with current political environment favoring them
  • If Democrats win House in November 2026, impeachment becomes probable in 2027-2028

Path to Conviction (The Critical Bottleneck): This is where the market's 22% probability appears slightly optimistic:

  1. Mathematical Challenge: Senate conviction requires 67 votes

    • Even if Democrats win Senate majority (challenging map, need +4 seats), they'd have ~51 senators
    • Would need 16 Republican senators to defect and vote to convict
    • Zero historical precedent for this level of cross-party conviction voting
  2. Republican Defection Analysis:

    • Trump retains strong Republican base loyalty
    • Republican senators face primary challenges from Trump-aligned candidates
    • Even during Trump's two previous impeachments with serious charges, maximum Republican defection was 7 senators (2021 impeachment)
    • Would need 2-3x historical maximum defection rate
  3. Precedent Weight: The complete absence of successful conviction in U.S. history is a powerful prior that should not be underweighted

Scenario Probability Assessment:

The market's 22% appears to be pricing in:

  • High probability of Democratic House takeover (~84%)
  • High probability of subsequent impeachment (~80-90% conditional on Democratic House)
  • Combined probability of ~12-15% from that path
  • Additional ~7-10% probability from extreme crisis scenarios or multiple attempts

My Adjustment: I estimate 18% probability, slightly below the 22% market consensus because:

  1. Senate Math is Nearly Insurmountable: Requiring 16 Republican defections with zero historical precedent is extremely unlikely even in crisis scenarios
  2. Time Decay: While there are ~3 years remaining, each failed attempt reduces political momentum
  3. Base Rate Weight: Zero successful convictions in history should anchor estimates lower
  4. War Rally Effects: Military conflicts often increase presidential support (rally-around-the-flag effect), though this can reverse with prolonged failures

Why Not Lower?

  • Unprecedented combination of crises (war, shutdown, executive overreach)
  • Long time horizon (until Jan 2029) allows multiple attempts
  • 60% disapproval is historically severe
  • Economic damage (oil >$100/barrel, equity sell-offs) could worsen significantly
  • If war escalates catastrophically or economic crisis deepens to 2008-level severity, Republican political calculus could shift

Edge Assessment: Market at 22% vs. my estimate of 18% represents modest overpricing (~4 percentage points). This suggests a potential edge on the NO side, though not overwhelming. The difference largely stems from my view that the market may be underweighting the constitutional impossibility of achieving 67 Senate votes and overweighting the impact of current crises on Republican senators' voting behavior.

Key Factors.

  • Constitutional requirement of 67 Senate votes creates nearly insurmountable barrier - zero historical precedent for conviction

  • 84% probability of Democratic House takeover in November 2026 makes impeachment highly likely, but conviction requires Republican defection

  • Current crises (Iran war, government shutdown, 60% disapproval) create impeachment pressure but insufficient for 16 Republican senators to defect

  • Long time horizon until January 2029 allows multiple impeachment attempts and potential for crises to worsen significantly

  • Market shows 70% impeachment probability but only 22% conviction probability - highlighting Senate conviction as critical bottleneck

  • Historical precedent: Trump's two previous impeachments achieved maximum 7 Republican votes for conviction, far below 16-17 needed

  • 2026 midterm elections 8 months away are pivotal - Democratic House control enables impeachment but not conviction

  • Economic damage from war (oil >$100/barrel, equity sell-offs) could worsen and shift Republican political calculus if recession develops

Scenarios.

Base Case: Impeachment Without Conviction

55%

Democrats flip House in November 2026 midterms and impeach Trump in 2027 on charges related to Iran war conduct, executive overreach, or constitutional violations. Senate trial occurs but fails to reach 67-vote threshold. Maximum 10-12 Republican senators vote to convict, far short of the 16-17 needed. Trump remains in office and completes term.

Trigger: Democratic House takeover in November 2026 (currently 84% probability), followed by formal impeachment proceedings in early 2027. Senate trial in spring/summer 2027 results in acquittal with 55-60 votes maximum for conviction.

Status Quo: No Impeachment

27%

Either Republicans retain narrow House control in 2026 midterms despite current headwinds, or Democrats win House but choose not to impeach due to futility concerns given impossible Senate math. Iran conflict resolves by summer 2026, economy stabilizes, and political pressure dissipates. Trump completes term without third impeachment attempt.

Trigger: Successful Iran negotiations by April-May 2026, oil prices decline below $80/barrel, government shutdown resolution, Republican House retention in November 2026, or Democratic leadership publicly ruling out impeachment as politically counterproductive.

Black Swan: Conviction Success

18%

Catastrophic scenario where crisis escalates dramatically: Iran war expands to regional conflict with massive U.S. casualties, economic collapse approaching 2008 severity, or constitutional crisis involving Trump refusing court orders. Republican senators face overwhelming constituent pressure. Unprecedented 16+ Republican senators vote to convict, removing Trump from office before January 2029.

Trigger: U.S. military casualties exceed 1,000+ deaths, unemployment spikes above 8%, major terrorist attack on U.S. soil linked to war, Trump approval drops below 30%, multiple Republican senators publicly call for resignation, Supreme Court unanimously rules against Trump on major constitutional issue, or Trump attempts to delay/cancel 2028 election.

Risks.

  • Iran war escalates dramatically with massive U.S. casualties or regional expansion, fundamentally shifting Republican senators' political incentives

  • Economic crisis deepens to Great Recession levels (8%+ unemployment, major bank failures) creating overwhelming pressure for removal

  • Major terrorist attack on U.S. soil linked to war failures could collapse Trump's Republican support overnight

  • Constitutional crisis where Trump openly defies Supreme Court ruling or attempts to delay 2028 election, forcing Republican hand

  • Multiple Republican senators in purple states face 2028 re-election pressure and calculate conviction as politically necessary

  • Underestimating unprecedented nature of current situation - combination of war, shutdown, and executive overreach has no historical parallel

  • Trump's mental/physical fitness questions emerge as Republicans seek off-ramp via 25th Amendment or conviction

  • Midterm forecasts are wrong - Republicans retain House making impeachment impossible, or Democrats win Senate supermajority changing math

  • Overweighting historical base rate in genuinely unprecedented crisis environment where past patterns may not apply

  • Rally-around-the-flag effect if war succeeds quickly, reversing current political trajectory and making removal impossible

Edge Assessment.

MODEST EDGE ON NO: My 18% estimate vs. market's 22% represents a 4 percentage point difference, suggesting the market is modestly overpricing the probability of conviction.

Rationale for Edge: The market appears to be overweighting the impact of current crises (Iran war, shutdown, 60% disapproval) and underweighting the constitutional near-impossibility of achieving 67 Senate votes. Even with catastrophic crisis escalation, requiring 16 Republican senators to defect has zero historical precedent - Trump's worst-case impeachment achieved only 7 Republican votes for conviction.

Trade Recommendation: WEAK NO BIAS - At 22%, there may be modest value betting NO, but the edge is not overwhelming. The 4-point difference could be explained by reasonable disagreement about tail-risk crisis scenarios. Key considerations:

  • If you believe the Senate math is truly insurmountable regardless of crisis severity → Bet NO
  • If you believe current crises could escalate to regime-breaking levels → Market price is fair or underpriced
  • Risk/reward favors NO slightly, but not strongly enough for high-conviction sizing

Monitoring Triggers: Watch for Iran war resolution (reduces probability), economic data (unemployment, GDP), Republican senator public statements, and November 2026 midterm results. If Democrats win House decisively in November, short-term impeachment odds will spike but conviction odds should remain low absent extreme crisis escalation.

What Would Change Our Mind.

  • Iran war escalates to 1,000+ U.S. military deaths or expands into regional conflict involving Saudi Arabia or Israel

  • U.S. unemployment rate spikes above 8% or other economic indicators signal Great Recession-level crisis

  • Trump approval rating drops below 30% overall or below 60% among Republicans specifically

  • Five or more Republican senators publicly call for Trump's resignation or signal openness to conviction

  • Supreme Court issues unanimous ruling against Trump on major constitutional issue that he then openly defies

  • Major terrorist attack on U.S. soil directly linked to failures in Iran war strategy

  • Democrats win not just House but also Senate in November 2026 midterms with larger-than-expected margins

  • Trump attempts to delay or cancel the 2028 presidential election via executive action

  • Iran conflict successfully resolves by summer 2026 with favorable terms and oil prices drop below $80/barrel (would reduce conviction probability further)

  • Multiple credible reports emerge about Trump's mental or physical fitness raising 25th Amendment discussions among Cabinet

Sources.

Get This Via API.

Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.

curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/kalshi/TICKER/analyze \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"

Related Analysis.

economics
NO TRADE

Fed Interest Rate Increase of 25+ bps After April 2026 Meeting

Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, the probability of a 25+ bps Fed rate hike at the April 28-29 meeting is estimated at 1%, precisely matching the CME FedWatch market-implied probability. This represents near-universal consensus that a hike will NOT occur. The overwhelming evidence includes: (1) the March 17-18 FOMC dot plot showing zero of 12 participants projecting any rate increases in 2026, with median forecast indicating one 25 bps CUT by year-end; (2) the only dissent at the March meeting was Governor Miran voting for a CUT, not a hike; (3) Chair Powell's messaging emphasizing patience and viewing current 3.50%-3.75% rates as "sufficiently restrictive"; (4) inflation attributed to temporary supply shocks (tariffs, Middle East energy crisis) rather than demand overheating requiring tighter policy; and (5) the Fed having just completed a cutting cycle in late 2025, with historical precedent showing such pauses lead to holds or eventual cuts, not renewed tightening. Even the most hawkish mainstream analysts expect no hikes until 2027 at earliest. With only 39 days until the April meeting, there is insufficient time for the catastrophic inflation data that would be required to force a complete Fed policy reversal. The market is correctly priced with no identifiable edge.

1%Mar 20, 2026
economicskalshi
SELL

Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?

The market assigns a 58.5% probability that a U.S. District Court will find Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly, while our analysis estimates 52%—a modest 6.5 percentage point discrepancy. The FTC's case has survived two dismissal attempts and benefits from a lengthy discovery period and favorable precedent (DOJ v. Google Search), but three factors suggest the market may be overconfident in a government victory: (1) Settlement risk is substantial—historical antitrust cases of this magnitude settle 40-60% of the time, and any settlement would resolve NO since it avoids a court monopoly finding; (2) FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's less aggressive stance than predecessor Lina Khan may increase settlement pressure despite maintaining the case for 18+ months; (3) High evidentiary burdens at trial—surviving pleading-stage motions does not translate linearly to proving complex market definition and anticompetitive effects claims. Our scenario modeling assigns 35% probability to government trial victory, 33% to settlement (resolves NO), and 32% to Amazon trial victory. Confidence is low (0.45) due to significant information asymmetry: discovery evidence quality, settlement negotiation status, and Judge Chun's substantive views remain opaque to public markets. The 4-year timeline to 2030 resolution creates substantial intervening event risk.

52%Mar 24, 2026
economicskalshi
NO TRADE

Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?

The market prices FTC victory at 65%, while my analysis estimates 58% probability that Judge Chun will rule Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly. The FTC has strong procedural momentum: Judge Chun denied Amazon's motion to dismiss in September 2024 (a significant positive signal as most antitrust cases surviving this hurdle have elevated government success rates), and Amazon's $2.5 billion Prime settlement before the same judge in September 2025 suggests compelling internal discovery evidence and judicial receptiveness to government arguments about Amazon's practices. However, the market appears to overly discount critical risks. Market definition remains contested as evidenced by the March 7, 2026 economics hearing—if Amazon successfully argues the relevant market includes all retail (Walmart, Target, brick-and-mortar), its market share falls below monopoly thresholds and the case collapses regardless of conduct evidence. Historical base rates show ~50-60% government win rates in monopoly maintenance trials. While procedural strength justifies upward adjustment, the 65% market price exceeds what the evidence supports given ongoing market definition disputes, discovery still in progress through April 2026, and inherent unpredictability of bench trial outcomes. The 7-percentage-point gap represents a modest edge but meaningful mispricing.

58%Mar 29, 2026
Pipeline: 152.2sSources: 8

This analysis is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice. Market conditions change rapidly.