kalshiMarch 30, 20262d agoWill Trump be impeached and removed from office?
Will Trump be impeached and removed from office before his term ends?
Signal
SELL
Probability
18%
Confidence
MEDIUM
72%
Summary.
The market prices Trump's impeachment AND removal at 22.5%, while my analysis estimates 18%. The core issue is the constitutional math: impeachment requires only a House simple majority (72% probable given Democratic midterm forecasts), but Senate conviction requires a 67-vote supermajority—meaning 15-16 Republican crossovers even if Democrats win Senate seats. Historical precedent is damning: Trump survived TWO prior impeachments with only 7 GOP defections even after January 6. The 50-percentage-point gap between impeachment probability (72%) and removal probability (22.5%) correctly reflects the "Senate conviction discount." My 18% estimate suggests the market overprices tail risks (criminal conviction, economic catastrophe, geopolitical disaster) by approximately 4.5 percentage points. While the 34-month time horizon until January 2029 allows for unknown scandals, the structural impossibility of achieving 67 votes in today's hyper-polarized Senate makes the base rate of 0% for presidential removal via impeachment the dominant consideration. This represents a modest edge favoring NO, though uncertainty about future crisis scenarios tempers confidence.
Reasoning.
Step-by-step analysis grounded in March 30, 2026:
Constitutional Mechanics: The resolution requires BOTH impeachment (House simple majority) AND conviction (Senate 2/3 supermajority = 67 votes) by January 20, 2029. This is a conjunctive probability requiring two independent hurdles.
Current Political Landscape (March 2026):
- House: Republicans hold razor-thin 218-214 majority (3 vacancies)
- Senate: Republicans hold 53-47 majority
- Democrats need net gain of 3-4 seats to flip House in November 2026 midterms
- Midterm forecasts: 72-84% probability Democrats win House control
Impeachment Probability (House): Markets price impeachment-only at 69-72%. This seems well-calibrated given:
- Democrats publicly discussing aggressive oversight and impeachment if they win in 2026
- Economic headwinds (gas >$3.70, crude >$100, sticky inflation) favor midterm backlash
- Timeline: Democrats could take control in January 2027, leaving ~24 months before term ends
- Assessment: 70-75% probability of impeachment if Democrats win House
Senate Conviction Probability (The Fatal Barrier): This is where the math becomes nearly impossible:
- Current Senate: 53R-47D
- Even in a Democratic wave scenario, best case is ~51-52 Democratic seats (unfavorable 2026 map)
- Conviction requires 67 votes
- With 51-52 Democratic seats, need 15-16 Republican crossover votes
- Historical precedent: Only 7 Republican Senators voted to convict Trump after January 6 (the most severe imaginable charges)
- Assessment: 20-25% probability Senate convicts GIVEN impeachment occurs
Combined Probability Calculation: P(Impeachment AND Removal) = P(Dems win House) × P(Impeachment | Dems win) × P(Conviction | Impeachment) = 0.78 × 0.92 × 0.25 = ~0.18 (18%)
Why 18% vs Market's 22.5%? The market appears to be pricing in ~4.5 percentage points of tail-risk premium for:
- Unprecedented scandal (e.g., criminal conviction, major geopolitical disaster)
- Economic collapse severe enough to fracture Republican unity
- Unknown unknowns over the next 34 months
However, historical base rate is 0% for presidential removal via impeachment. Trump survived TWO prior impeachments with minimal Republican defections. The Senate math is structurally prohibitive even in extreme scenarios.
Key Insight: The 50-percentage-point gap between impeachment probability (72%) and removal probability (22.5%) represents the "Senate conviction discount" - markets correctly recognize the near-impossibility of achieving 67 votes in today's polarized environment.
My 18% estimate reflects:
- High likelihood of Democratic House control post-2026
- Very high likelihood of impeachment if Democrats control House
- Very low likelihood (~20-25%) of Senate conviction even given impeachment
- Slight skepticism that tail risks justify the full 22.5% market price
The difference is modest (18% vs 22.5%), suggesting the market is reasonably efficient but may be slightly overpricing extreme tail scenarios.
Key Factors.
Senate conviction requires 67-vote supermajority (2/3), making removal structurally near-impossible with 53R-47D current composition
Historical precedent: 0 of 4 presidential impeachments resulted in removal; Trump survived TWO prior impeachments with minimal GOP defections (only 7 Republican votes in Jan 6 trial)
2026 midterm forecasts show 72-84% probability Democrats win House control, needing only 3-4 seat net gain from current 218-214 Republican majority
Even optimistic Democratic Senate scenario yields ~51-52 seats, requiring 15-16 Republican crossover votes for conviction
Economic headwinds (gas >$3.70, crude >$100, sticky inflation) support midterm backlash narrative favoring Democratic House gains
House Democrats have publicly signaled intent to pursue impeachment if they win majority in 2027
Market efficiency: Strong consensus between Kalshi (21-22.7%) and Polymarket (~22.5%) suggests well-informed pricing
Timeline: 34 months remaining until term ends (Jan 20, 2029), providing sufficient window for impeachment process if Democrats win in Nov 2026
Scenarios.
Base Case: Impeachment Without Removal
52%Democrats win House in November 2026 midterms (78% likely) and impeach Trump in 2027 on charges related to Iran policy, economic mismanagement, or other controversies. However, Senate Republicans maintain party discipline and conviction fails to reach 67 votes, with only 5-10 Republican Senators voting to convict. Trump remains in office through end of term.
Trigger: Democratic House majority in January 2027, aggressive oversight hearings begin Q1 2027, impeachment articles passed by Q2-Q3 2027, Senate trial fails with ~55-62 votes for conviction (short of 67 needed)
Bull Case: Unprecedented Crisis Enables Removal
18%Democrats win House and impeach Trump, but a catastrophic event occurs that fractures Republican Senate unity: major criminal conviction, severe economic collapse (depression-level), catastrophic geopolitical failure causing mass casualties, or credible evidence of conduct so egregious that 15-16 Republican Senators vote to convict. This represents the tail-risk scenarios priced into markets.
Trigger: Criminal conviction in state/federal court, economic indicators showing GDP contraction >5%, major foreign policy disaster, credible national security breach, or financial crisis requiring emergency intervention. Public polling showing Trump approval <25% among Republicans.
Bear Case: No Impeachment at All
30%Either Republicans retain House control in 2026 midterms (22-28% probability) making impeachment impossible, OR Democrats win House but decide impeachment is politically counterproductive given certain Senate acquittal. Economic conditions improve by late 2026, reducing midterm backlash. Democrats pursue aggressive oversight but stop short of impeachment articles.
Trigger: Republicans hold House with 220+ seats post-2026, OR Democratic leadership publicly rules out impeachment citing futility, OR economic indicators improve (gas <$3.00, inflation cooling) reducing voter anger by November 2026
Risks.
Unknowable future scandals: A revelation far more severe than January 6 could theoretically shift Republican Senate votes (though historical precedent suggests even this is unlikely)
Economic catastrophe: Depression-level economic collapse could fracture partisan loyalty and create political pressure for removal
Geopolitical disaster: Major foreign policy failure resulting in mass U.S. casualties could shift public opinion dramatically enough to force Republican defections
Criminal conviction: Federal or state criminal conviction during presidency could change political calculus for Senate Republicans
Midterm forecast error: Democratic House win probability is 72-84% but not certain; Republicans could retain control making impeachment impossible
Senate map uncertainty: 2026 Senate races are 8 months away; actual Democratic seat gains could exceed or fall short of projections
Overconfidence in historical precedent: Assuming past patterns hold may underweight genuine tail risks in unprecedented political environment
Partisan dealignment: Unforeseen political realignment or Republican Party fracture could make conviction threshold achievable
Time horizon: 34-month window allows for multiple unforeseen events that could shift probabilities significantly
Edge Assessment.
MODEST EDGE - SLIGHT UNDERWEIGHT
My estimated probability of 18% vs market's 22.5% represents a 4.5 percentage point difference (20% relative difference). This suggests the market may be slightly overpricing tail-risk scenarios.
Case for market being too high:
- Historical base rate is 0% for presidential removal via impeachment
- Trump specifically survived TWO impeachments with minimal Republican defections (7 votes even after Jan 6)
- Senate math is structurally prohibitive: even best-case Democratic majority (~52 seats) requires 15-16 Republican crossover votes
- Extreme partisan polarization makes 67-vote threshold nearly impossible to achieve
Case for market being correct/underestimating:
- 34-month time horizon allows for multiple unknown scandals or crises
- Economic conditions are deteriorating (high gas/oil prices, inflation), potentially worsening
- Iran tensions could escalate into major foreign policy disaster
- Criminal trial outcomes remain uncertain
- The 22.5% may appropriately price true "black swan" tail risks
Edge Assessment: SMALL EDGE favoring UNDERWEIGHT (betting NO). The 18% vs 22.5% gap is meaningful but not enormous. Given the high historical base rate of partisan loyalty and structural impossibility of 67 Senate votes, I assess a modest 20-25% probability the market is overpriced. However, confidence is tempered by genuine uncertainty about future events over 34 months.
Recommended position sizing: Small to moderate, as this is a modest edge in a reasonably efficient market with significant tail risks.
What Would Change Our Mind.
Criminal conviction in federal or state court before 2029, particularly on charges involving national security or corruption
Economic indicators showing GDP contraction exceeding 5% or sustained depression-level conditions that fracture Republican partisan unity
Major geopolitical catastrophe directly attributable to Trump policy decisions resulting in mass U.S. casualties (e.g., Iran conflict escalation)
Public polling showing Trump job approval falling below 25% among Republican voters, indicating party base abandonment
Credible reporting that 10+ Republican Senators are privately signaling openness to conviction in event of impeachment
2026 Senate election results producing Democratic majority of 54+ seats, materially reducing number of required Republican crossover votes
Republicans retaining House control in November 2026 midterms, making impeachment impossible and justifying immediate exit of NO position
Emergence of bipartisan consensus on impeachment articles in House similar to Nixon resignation pressure in 1974
Sources.
- Kalshi - Trump Impeachment and Removal Market
- Polymarket - Trump Impeachment and Conviction Markets
- 2026 Midterm Election Forecasts - House and Senate
- 119th Congress Chamber Composition
- Bloomberg Energy Markets - Crude Oil and Gas Prices
- Bureau of Labor Statistics - Producer Price Index Report
- Democratic House Strategy for 2027 Session
- Historical Senate Impeachment Voting Records
Get This Via API.
Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.
curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/kalshi/TICKER/analyze \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Related Analysis.
Fed Interest Rate Increase of 25+ bps After April 2026 Meeting
Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, the probability of a 25+ bps Fed rate hike at the April 28-29 meeting is estimated at 1%, precisely matching the CME FedWatch market-implied probability. This represents near-universal consensus that a hike will NOT occur. The overwhelming evidence includes: (1) the March 17-18 FOMC dot plot showing zero of 12 participants projecting any rate increases in 2026, with median forecast indicating one 25 bps CUT by year-end; (2) the only dissent at the March meeting was Governor Miran voting for a CUT, not a hike; (3) Chair Powell's messaging emphasizing patience and viewing current 3.50%-3.75% rates as "sufficiently restrictive"; (4) inflation attributed to temporary supply shocks (tariffs, Middle East energy crisis) rather than demand overheating requiring tighter policy; and (5) the Fed having just completed a cutting cycle in late 2025, with historical precedent showing such pauses lead to holds or eventual cuts, not renewed tightening. Even the most hawkish mainstream analysts expect no hikes until 2027 at earliest. With only 39 days until the April meeting, there is insufficient time for the catastrophic inflation data that would be required to force a complete Fed policy reversal. The market is correctly priced with no identifiable edge.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market assigns a 58.5% probability that a U.S. District Court will find Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly, while our analysis estimates 52%—a modest 6.5 percentage point discrepancy. The FTC's case has survived two dismissal attempts and benefits from a lengthy discovery period and favorable precedent (DOJ v. Google Search), but three factors suggest the market may be overconfident in a government victory: (1) Settlement risk is substantial—historical antitrust cases of this magnitude settle 40-60% of the time, and any settlement would resolve NO since it avoids a court monopoly finding; (2) FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's less aggressive stance than predecessor Lina Khan may increase settlement pressure despite maintaining the case for 18+ months; (3) High evidentiary burdens at trial—surviving pleading-stage motions does not translate linearly to proving complex market definition and anticompetitive effects claims. Our scenario modeling assigns 35% probability to government trial victory, 33% to settlement (resolves NO), and 32% to Amazon trial victory. Confidence is low (0.45) due to significant information asymmetry: discovery evidence quality, settlement negotiation status, and Judge Chun's substantive views remain opaque to public markets. The 4-year timeline to 2030 resolution creates substantial intervening event risk.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market prices FTC victory at 65%, while my analysis estimates 58% probability that Judge Chun will rule Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly. The FTC has strong procedural momentum: Judge Chun denied Amazon's motion to dismiss in September 2024 (a significant positive signal as most antitrust cases surviving this hurdle have elevated government success rates), and Amazon's $2.5 billion Prime settlement before the same judge in September 2025 suggests compelling internal discovery evidence and judicial receptiveness to government arguments about Amazon's practices. However, the market appears to overly discount critical risks. Market definition remains contested as evidenced by the March 7, 2026 economics hearing—if Amazon successfully argues the relevant market includes all retail (Walmart, Target, brick-and-mortar), its market share falls below monopoly thresholds and the case collapses regardless of conduct evidence. Historical base rates show ~50-60% government win rates in monopoly maintenance trials. While procedural strength justifies upward adjustment, the 65% market price exceeds what the evidence supports given ongoing market definition disputes, discovery still in progress through April 2026, and inherent unpredictability of bench trial outcomes. The 7-percentage-point gap represents a modest edge but meaningful mispricing.