polymarketMarch 31, 20261d agoWill Jobbik win the most seats in the 2026 Hungarian parliamentary election?
Will Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik) win the most seats in the next Hungarian parliamentary election?
Signal
NO TRADE
Probability
0%
Confidence
HIGH
99%
Summary.
The market is correctly priced at near-zero probability (0.05%) for a Jobbik victory in the April 12, 2026 Hungarian parliamentary election, now just 12 days away. Our analysis confirms an estimated probability of effectively 0.00%, representing not a probabilistic forecast but a structural impossibility. Jobbik failed to collect sufficient signatures to qualify for the national proportional list ballot, which allocates 93 of the National Assembly's 199 seats (46.7%). Without access to these proportional seats, Jobbik is mathematically eliminated from winning the most seats—even a theoretical sweep of all 106 single-member constituencies would be insufficient, as the leading parties (Tisza at 45-50% and Fidesz-KDNP at 39-43% in polling) will each exceed this total through their combined constituency and proportional victories. The 5 basis point difference between our 0.00% estimate and the market's 0.05% represents an appropriate buffer for extreme tail risks (resolution errors, data misinterpretation, unforeseen legal reversals) rather than exploitable edge. This is a categorical disqualification with no time remaining for ballot status changes before the election.
Reasoning.
This is a structural impossibility scenario, not a probabilistic forecast. The key decisive factor is categorical:
Ballot Disqualification = Mathematical Elimination Jobbik failed to collect sufficient signatures to qualify for the national proportional list ballot in 2026. Hungary's National Assembly has 199 seats: 106 via single-member constituencies and 93 via nationwide proportional representation. Without access to the proportional list (46.7% of all seats), Jobbik is mathematically eliminated from winning "the most seats."
Why Jobbik Cannot Win:
- Maximum theoretical seats: Even if Jobbik miraculously won all 106 single-member constituencies (impossible given it's not a major party), it would have 106 seats
- Competition baseline: Tisza Party (45-50% polling) and Fidesz-KDNP (39-43% polling) will each win substantial proportional seats (93 available) plus their own constituency seats
- Realistic math: With only 12 days until the April 12, 2026 election, Jobbik's ballot status cannot change. The two leading parties will each exceed 106 seats through their combined constituency + proportional representation victories
Market Calibration: The market at 0.05% (0.0005) is essentially pricing this correctly as a structural impossibility with only residual probability for:
- Catastrophic data/resolution errors
- Unforeseen technicalities
- Market maker fat-finger mistakes
Temporal Grounding: Analysis date: March 31, 2026 Election date: April 12, 2026 (12 days away) Research is current and appropriate. No time remains for ballot qualification changes.
My estimated probability: effectively 0.00% (rounded to 0.0000). The market at 0.05% is pricing in a small buffer for extreme tail risks that is reasonable.
Key Factors.
Jobbik disqualified from national proportional list (93 of 199 seats) due to signature collection failure
Mathematical impossibility: maximum 106 constituency seats available, but leading parties will exceed this through combined constituency + proportional wins
Election occurs in 12 days (April 12, 2026) - no time for ballot status reversal
Current polling shows two-party race between Tisza (45-50%) and Fidesz-KDNP (39-43%), both far ahead of Jobbik
Hungary's mixed-member proportional system requires proportional list access to compete for plurality of seats
Legacy opposition parties have withdrawn, consolidating anti-Fidesz vote with Tisza, further marginalizing Jobbik
Scenarios.
Base Case: Jobbik Structurally Eliminated
100%Jobbik remains disqualified from the proportional list ballot. The party either wins zero seats or a small number of constituency seats (realistically 0-5 given its marginal status and lack of national list presence). Tisza Party or Fidesz-KDNP wins the most seats with tallies well exceeding 100 seats each through their combined constituency and proportional victories.
Trigger: Official April 12, 2026 election results from the Hungarian Election Authority (Nemzeti Választási Iroda) showing Jobbik with fewer than 50 seats while the leading party has 100+ seats.
Data/Resolution Error
0%Catastrophic error in data interpretation: perhaps 'Jobbik' refers to a different entity, or there's a last-minute court ruling overturning the ballot disqualification (extremely unlikely 12 days before election), or the resolution source misreports results.
Trigger: Emergency court decision reversing ballot disqualification, or discovery that the research memo confused Jobbik with another party, or Hungarian Election Authority database error.
Black Swan Electoral Chaos
0%Election is invalidated, postponed beyond October 31, 2026 (triggering 'Other' resolution), or both Tisza and Fidesz are disqualified for fraud. Even in such chaos, Jobbik without proportional list access cannot win the most seats, but resolution becomes ambiguous.
Trigger: Constitutional crisis, election cancellation, or international non-recognition of results forcing resolution to 'Other' rather than YES/NO.
Risks.
Research memo misidentifies the party: 'Jobbik' in the bet question refers to a different entity than the disqualified Jobbik Movement
Last-minute court ruling overturns ballot disqualification (extremely unlikely 12 days before election with no indication of pending litigation)
Resolution criteria interpretation error: market resolves on preliminary counts that are later corrected
Election postponed or invalidated, triggering 'Other' resolution instead of clear NO
Catastrophic simultaneous disqualification of both Tisza and Fidesz (no evidence suggesting this possibility)
Edge Assessment.
NO EDGE - Market is correctly priced. The market at 0.05% (0.0005) vs. my estimate of effectively 0.00% represents appropriate pricing for a structural impossibility. The 5 basis point difference (0.05%) is a reasonable buffer for extreme tail risks (resolution errors, data misinterpretation, unforeseen technicalities).
This is not a probabilistic forecast but a categorical constraint: Jobbik cannot win without proportional list access. The market has correctly identified this and priced accordingly. There is no exploitable edge here - both the market and objective analysis converge on 'near-impossible.'
Any attempt to bet NO at 99.95% implied probability carries counterparty risk, opportunity cost, and tail risk that outweighs the tiny theoretical edge. The market is efficiently priced for this binary structural constraint.
What Would Change Our Mind.
Emergency court ruling within the next 12 days overturning Jobbik's ballot disqualification and granting access to the proportional list
Discovery that the research data misidentified the party and 'Jobbik' in the bet question refers to a different qualified entity
Evidence of catastrophic simultaneous disqualification of both Tisza Party and Fidesz-KDNP from the election
Election postponed or invalidated beyond the October 31, 2026 resolution deadline, triggering 'Other' resolution
Revelation that Hungary changed its electoral system to eliminate proportional representation entirely (no evidence of this)
Sources.
Market History.
7-day range: 0¢ – 0¢.
Get This Via API.
Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.
curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/polymarket/TICKER/analyze \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Related Analysis.
Fed Interest Rate Increase of 25+ bps After April 2026 Meeting
Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, the probability of a 25+ bps Fed rate hike at the April 28-29 meeting is estimated at 1%, precisely matching the CME FedWatch market-implied probability. This represents near-universal consensus that a hike will NOT occur. The overwhelming evidence includes: (1) the March 17-18 FOMC dot plot showing zero of 12 participants projecting any rate increases in 2026, with median forecast indicating one 25 bps CUT by year-end; (2) the only dissent at the March meeting was Governor Miran voting for a CUT, not a hike; (3) Chair Powell's messaging emphasizing patience and viewing current 3.50%-3.75% rates as "sufficiently restrictive"; (4) inflation attributed to temporary supply shocks (tariffs, Middle East energy crisis) rather than demand overheating requiring tighter policy; and (5) the Fed having just completed a cutting cycle in late 2025, with historical precedent showing such pauses lead to holds or eventual cuts, not renewed tightening. Even the most hawkish mainstream analysts expect no hikes until 2027 at earliest. With only 39 days until the April meeting, there is insufficient time for the catastrophic inflation data that would be required to force a complete Fed policy reversal. The market is correctly priced with no identifiable edge.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market assigns a 58.5% probability that a U.S. District Court will find Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly, while our analysis estimates 52%—a modest 6.5 percentage point discrepancy. The FTC's case has survived two dismissal attempts and benefits from a lengthy discovery period and favorable precedent (DOJ v. Google Search), but three factors suggest the market may be overconfident in a government victory: (1) Settlement risk is substantial—historical antitrust cases of this magnitude settle 40-60% of the time, and any settlement would resolve NO since it avoids a court monopoly finding; (2) FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's less aggressive stance than predecessor Lina Khan may increase settlement pressure despite maintaining the case for 18+ months; (3) High evidentiary burdens at trial—surviving pleading-stage motions does not translate linearly to proving complex market definition and anticompetitive effects claims. Our scenario modeling assigns 35% probability to government trial victory, 33% to settlement (resolves NO), and 32% to Amazon trial victory. Confidence is low (0.45) due to significant information asymmetry: discovery evidence quality, settlement negotiation status, and Judge Chun's substantive views remain opaque to public markets. The 4-year timeline to 2030 resolution creates substantial intervening event risk.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market prices FTC victory at 65%, while my analysis estimates 58% probability that Judge Chun will rule Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly. The FTC has strong procedural momentum: Judge Chun denied Amazon's motion to dismiss in September 2024 (a significant positive signal as most antitrust cases surviving this hurdle have elevated government success rates), and Amazon's $2.5 billion Prime settlement before the same judge in September 2025 suggests compelling internal discovery evidence and judicial receptiveness to government arguments about Amazon's practices. However, the market appears to overly discount critical risks. Market definition remains contested as evidenced by the March 7, 2026 economics hearing—if Amazon successfully argues the relevant market includes all retail (Walmart, Target, brick-and-mortar), its market share falls below monopoly thresholds and the case collapses regardless of conduct evidence. Historical base rates show ~50-60% government win rates in monopoly maintenance trials. While procedural strength justifies upward adjustment, the 65% market price exceeds what the evidence supports given ongoing market definition disputes, discovery still in progress through April 2026, and inherent unpredictability of bench trial outcomes. The 7-percentage-point gap represents a modest edge but meaningful mispricing.