polymarketApril 2, 202610h agoWill Jobbik win the most seats in the 2026 Hungarian parliamentary election?
Will Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik) win the most seats in the next Hungarian parliamentary election?
Signal
NO TRADE
Probability
0%
Confidence
HIGH
100%
Summary.
The market is correctly pricing this at near-zero (0.05% implied probability vs. 0.0% estimated probability). Jobbik has been officially excluded from the April 12, 2026 ballot after failing to collect required signatures for national party list access—confirmed by the Hungarian Election Authority (valasztas.hu), the same source that will determine resolution. This is not merely improbable but mathematically impossible: Jobbik cannot win seats in an election they cannot contest. With 93 of 199 seats allocated via the national proportional list they're excluded from, and polling at 0% support in all recent surveys (Zavecz, 21 Research, PolitPro) taken days before the election, there is no pathway to victory. The election has consolidated into a two-party race between Tisza Party (leading at 48.6-56%) and Fidesz (37-40.9%). The minimal market odds of 0.0005 appropriately reflect only liquidity floor and marginal administrative delay risk, not genuine probability of a YES outcome.
Reasoning.
This is a case of mathematical impossibility, not merely extreme improbability.
Step 1: Ballot Access Status (Verified)
- The Hungarian Election Authority (valasztas.hu) officially confirms that Jobbik failed to collect required signatures for national party list ballot access
- Jobbik will NOT appear on the national ballot on April 12, 2026 (10 days from today)
- This is the first election since 2006 where Jobbik lacks ballot access
Step 2: Electoral System Mathematics
- Hungary uses a mixed-member electoral system with 199 total seats
- 93 seats (46.7%) are allocated via national proportional list
- 106 seats are allocated via single-member constituencies
- To win "most seats" requires at minimum 100 seats (50.3% of 199)
Step 3: Mathematical Impossibility Analysis
- Maximum theoretical seats for Jobbik: 106 (if they somehow won ALL constituency seats)
- This requires winning in individual constituencies without national list support
- Even in this impossible scenario, 106 seats > 100 threshold BUT:
- Jobbik polls at 0% nationally (below 5% threshold in all polls)
- They lack organizational infrastructure after ballot access failure
- Tisza Party leads at 48.6-56%, Fidesz at 37-40.9%
- These two parties will dominate both list and constituency seats
Step 4: Current Political Reality (April 2, 2026)
- Election is in 10 days - campaign period is effectively over
- Latest polling (April 1, 2026) shows two-party race: Tisza vs. Fidesz
- Jobbik registers at 0% support in all recent polls (Zavecz, 21 Research, PolitPro aggregator)
- Traditional opposition has collapsed with voters consolidating behind Tisza Party
- Even the third-placed Mi Hazánk only polls at 5.4%
Step 5: Historical Base Rate
- No party in Hungary's modern democratic history (post-1990) has won an election without national list access
- In mixed electoral systems globally, national ballot exclusion has never resulted in winning most seats
- Parties typically derive 40-50% of seats from proportional lists
Step 6: Resolution Mechanics
- Resolution based on official results from valasztas.hu (same source confirming ballot exclusion)
- No ambiguity exists - Jobbik cannot win seats they cannot contest
- Only edge case: results delayed past October 31, 2026 → "Other" resolution (extremely unlikely for a scheduled election)
Conclusion: The estimated probability is 0.0 (true zero, not rounded). This bet should resolve NO with absolute certainty barring extraordinary administrative irregularities that would invalidate the entire election. The market odds of 0.0005 (0.05%) likely represent only the minimum bid/liquidity floor rather than genuine belief in a YES outcome.
Key Factors.
Jobbik officially excluded from national ballot - confirmed by Hungarian Election Authority (valasztas.hu)
93 of 199 seats allocated via national proportional list which Jobbik cannot contest
Jobbik polls at 0% support in all recent surveys (Zavecz, 21 Research, PolitPro aggregator from April 1, 2026)
Election is 10 days away - no time for ballot status reversal or campaign recovery
Two-party race structure: Tisza leads 48.6-56%, Fidesz at 37-40.9% - will capture virtually all seats
Historical precedent: No party has won without national list access in Hungary's modern democracy
Market odds of 0.0005 reflect only liquidity floor, not genuine probability
Scenarios.
Base Case: Jobbik Wins Zero Seats
100%Jobbik is excluded from the national ballot and fails to win any constituency seats. They receive near-zero votes as confirmed by polling. Election proceeds as a two-party contest between Tisza (48.6%) and Fidesz (40.9%) with Tisza likely winning most seats. Resolution is clearly NO based on official results published within days of April 12.
Trigger: Official results from valasztas.hu showing Jobbik with 0 seats. Tisza Party wins plurality or majority of 199 National Assembly seats. Results certified by April 20, 2026.
Administrative Delay Case
1%Election proceeds normally with Jobbik excluded and winning zero seats, but extraordinary circumstances (legal challenges, counting irregularities, political crisis) delay official certification past the October 31, 2026 deadline. Bet resolves to 'Other' rather than NO. This does not represent a Jobbik victory - merely a resolution technicality.
Trigger: Disputed election results, constitutional crisis, or unprecedented administrative failure preventing certification for 6+ months. Major news coverage of Hungarian electoral crisis through October 2026.
Impossible Scenario: Jobbik Wins Most Seats
0%This scenario has zero probability as it violates confirmed electoral law. Jobbik is administratively excluded from the ballot. For them to win seats would require: (1) reversal of ballot exclusion with 10 days notice (legally impossible), (2) massive write-in campaign succeeding in 100+ constituencies (Hungary doesn't allow write-ins for excluded parties), or (3) complete fabrication of election results. None are plausible.
Trigger: No realistic evidence pathway exists. Would require overthrow of Hungarian electoral system and/or complete data fabrication that contradicts official authority.
Risks.
Administrative/resolution delay past October 31, 2026 deadline causing 'Other' resolution instead of NO (very low probability ~0.5%)
Misunderstanding of resolution criteria - but criteria clearly states 'most seats in National Assembly' which requires ballot access
Complete electoral system breakdown or invalidation - would affect all parties, not enable Jobbik victory
Data error in research - but multiple independent sources (election authority, 3 pollsters, European analysts) confirm same facts
Last-minute ballot restoration by court order - legally implausible with 10 days to election and campaigns concluded
Edge Assessment.
No edge exists here - the market is correctly priced. The market odds of 0.0005 (0.05%) vs. my estimate of 0.0% represent appropriate pricing for a mathematically impossible outcome. The tiny market probability likely reflects only the minimum liquidity/bid floor and perhaps marginal risk of administrative 'Other' resolution. There is no betting value on either side - the NO outcome is certain barring extraordinary administrative delays (which would trigger 'Other' not 'YES'). This is one of the rare cases where a prediction market can legitimately price an outcome at effective zero, as the event is not merely improbable but mathematically precluded by confirmed ballot exclusion. Any participant betting YES at any odds would be making an error, not finding edge.
What Would Change Our Mind.
Hungarian Election Authority reverses ballot exclusion decision and grants Jobbik national list access (legally implausible with 10 days to election)
Emergency court ruling overturning ballot access requirements and retroactively qualifying Jobbik (no evidence of such legal challenge in progress)
Polling data from April 2-11, 2026 showing Jobbik surge above 40% support (would contradict all current data showing 0% support)
Constitutional crisis or electoral system breakdown that invalidates standard ballot procedures (would likely trigger 'Other' resolution rather than enable Jobbik victory)
Discovery that research data is fundamentally incorrect and Jobbik actually does have ballot access (extremely unlikely given multiple independent source confirmation including official election authority)
Sources.
Get This Via API.
Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.
curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/polymarket/TICKER/analyze \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Related Analysis.
Fed Interest Rate Increase of 25+ bps After April 2026 Meeting
Based on analysis as of March 20, 2026, the probability of a 25+ bps Fed rate hike at the April 28-29 meeting is estimated at 1%, precisely matching the CME FedWatch market-implied probability. This represents near-universal consensus that a hike will NOT occur. The overwhelming evidence includes: (1) the March 17-18 FOMC dot plot showing zero of 12 participants projecting any rate increases in 2026, with median forecast indicating one 25 bps CUT by year-end; (2) the only dissent at the March meeting was Governor Miran voting for a CUT, not a hike; (3) Chair Powell's messaging emphasizing patience and viewing current 3.50%-3.75% rates as "sufficiently restrictive"; (4) inflation attributed to temporary supply shocks (tariffs, Middle East energy crisis) rather than demand overheating requiring tighter policy; and (5) the Fed having just completed a cutting cycle in late 2025, with historical precedent showing such pauses lead to holds or eventual cuts, not renewed tightening. Even the most hawkish mainstream analysts expect no hikes until 2027 at earliest. With only 39 days until the April meeting, there is insufficient time for the catastrophic inflation data that would be required to force a complete Fed policy reversal. The market is correctly priced with no identifiable edge.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market assigns a 58.5% probability that a U.S. District Court will find Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly, while our analysis estimates 52%—a modest 6.5 percentage point discrepancy. The FTC's case has survived two dismissal attempts and benefits from a lengthy discovery period and favorable precedent (DOJ v. Google Search), but three factors suggest the market may be overconfident in a government victory: (1) Settlement risk is substantial—historical antitrust cases of this magnitude settle 40-60% of the time, and any settlement would resolve NO since it avoids a court monopoly finding; (2) FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's less aggressive stance than predecessor Lina Khan may increase settlement pressure despite maintaining the case for 18+ months; (3) High evidentiary burdens at trial—surviving pleading-stage motions does not translate linearly to proving complex market definition and anticompetitive effects claims. Our scenario modeling assigns 35% probability to government trial victory, 33% to settlement (resolves NO), and 32% to Amazon trial victory. Confidence is low (0.45) due to significant information asymmetry: discovery evidence quality, settlement negotiation status, and Judge Chun's substantive views remain opaque to public markets. The 4-year timeline to 2030 resolution creates substantial intervening event risk.
Courts consider Amazon a monopoly?
The market prices FTC victory at 65%, while my analysis estimates 58% probability that Judge Chun will rule Amazon illegally maintained a monopoly. The FTC has strong procedural momentum: Judge Chun denied Amazon's motion to dismiss in September 2024 (a significant positive signal as most antitrust cases surviving this hurdle have elevated government success rates), and Amazon's $2.5 billion Prime settlement before the same judge in September 2025 suggests compelling internal discovery evidence and judicial receptiveness to government arguments about Amazon's practices. However, the market appears to overly discount critical risks. Market definition remains contested as evidenced by the March 7, 2026 economics hearing—if Amazon successfully argues the relevant market includes all retail (Walmart, Target, brick-and-mortar), its market share falls below monopoly thresholds and the case collapses regardless of conduct evidence. Historical base rates show ~50-60% government win rates in monopoly maintenance trials. While procedural strength justifies upward adjustment, the 65% market price exceeds what the evidence supports given ongoing market definition disputes, discovery still in progress through April 2026, and inherent unpredictability of bench trial outcomes. The 7-percentage-point gap represents a modest edge but meaningful mispricing.