rekko.ai
entertainmentkalshi logokalshiMay 6, 20264d ago

Will Ron DeSantis be Trump's next Attorney General?

Will Ron DeSantis be the first new person to serve as Attorney General before January 20, 2029?

Resolves Jan 20, 2029, 3:00 PM UTC
View on kalshi

Signal

NO TRADE

Probability

2%

Market: 2%Edge: 0pp

Confidence

MEDIUM

75%

Summary.

The market implies a 2.25% probability that Ron DeSantis will be the first new Attorney General confirmed before January 2029, while our analysis estimates the true probability at approximately 1.8%—suggesting the market is slightly overpriced by about 25% in relative terms (0.45 percentage points absolute). The core challenge for DeSantis is structural: Todd Blanche currently holds the Acting AG position with a commanding 65%+ market probability, and Trump explicitly told him to treat the role as an "audition." The market's critical resolution rule states that if anyone else is confirmed first, the DeSantis contract permanently resolves to NO. While Axios reported in late April 2026 that DeSantis was "begging" for the AG role, DeSantis publicly denied this on April 23, creating reputational costs to reversing course. Additionally, DeSantis remains Florida Governor until January 2027 (8 months away), creating a timing mismatch with Trump's need for a permanent AG. The small probability estimate (~1.8%) reflects narrow pathways: Blanche failing his audition without getting nominated, Trump leaving the position unfilled until DeSantis becomes available in 2027, or multiple candidates ahead of DeSantis declining or failing. The 2.7-year resolution window creates tail-risk scenarios, but Blanche's incumbency advantage and loyalty-proving actions make early confirmation likely.

Reasoning.

This is a political appointment market, not an entertainment awards market, but I'll apply rigorous probability analysis:

Timeline Context (May 6, 2026):

  • Pam Bondi was fired April 2, 2026 (34 days ago)
  • Todd Blanche is currently Acting AG
  • Resolution window extends until January 20, 2029 (nearly 3 years)
  • DeSantis's governorship ends January 2027 (8 months away)

Key Structural Barriers for DeSantis (Base Rate ~2%):

  1. Sequential Resolution Lock: The critical constraint is that DeSantis must be the FIRST new person confirmed. If Blanche (65% market probability) or Zeldin (16.5%) gets confirmed first, DeSantis's contract permanently resolves to NO regardless of what happens later.

  2. Dominant Frontrunner: Todd Blanche has overwhelming advantages:

    • Already in acting role (incumbency advantage)
    • Trump explicitly called it an "audition" (direct signal of intent)
    • Actively proving loyalty through controversial actions (dropping Powell investigation, firing career prosecutors)
    • Personal relationship as Trump's defense attorney
    • Market odds: 63-67%
  3. Public Denial vs. Private Interest:

    • Axios (high-credibility outlet) reported DeSantis "begging" for AG role in late April
    • DeSantis publicly denied on April 23, calling reports "fake rumors"
    • The denial creates political cost to accepting the role now (looks like lying)
    • However, Axios sourcing suggests real private discussions occurred
  4. Current Position Constraint: DeSantis is still Florida Governor until January 2027. Early resignation would be politically damaging and leave legislative agenda incomplete.

Pathways to DeSantis Victory (Combined ~1.8%):

Scenario A: Blanche Fails Audition (0.8% probability)

  • Trump decides Blanche is too legally cautious or makes political mistake
  • Trump passes over Blanche without nominating him for permanent role
  • DeSantis publicly reverses position or Trump uses recess appointment to avoid confirmation theatrics
  • Requires: Blanche failure + DeSantis willing to accept + no Zeldin nomination first
  • Estimated probability: ~25% Blanche not nominated × 15% DeSantis becomes first choice × 20% DeSantis accepts = 0.8%

Scenario B: Extended Acting Period Then DeSantis (0.6% probability)

  • Trump leaves Blanche as Acting AG for extended period (has precedent)
  • DeSantis term ends January 2027, becomes available
  • Trump nominates DeSantis in early-mid 2027 after cooling-off period from denial
  • Requires: No permanent AG nominated for 8+ months + DeSantis interest genuine + beats other candidates
  • Estimated probability: ~20% no one confirmed by Jan 2027 × 10% DeSantis first choice then × 30% he accepts = 0.6%

Scenario C: Zeldin Declines/Fails, DeSantis Second Choice (0.4% probability)

  • Blanche nominated but fails Senate confirmation (unlikely with likely GOP Senate)
  • Zeldin offered but declines or fails
  • DeSantis becomes consensus choice
  • Estimated probability: ~10% Blanche fails × 20% Zeldin next × 20% Zeldin fails/declines × ~10% DeSantis next = 0.4%

Why Market at 2.25% Might Be Slightly High:

  1. Denial credibility: DeSantis's public statement creates reputational cost
  2. Timeline mismatch: He's unavailable until January 2027, but Trump needs AG momentum now
  3. Alternative roles: Axios mentioned Defense Secretary and SCOTUS as other interests—DeSantis might pursue those instead
  4. Trump loyalty hierarchy: Blanche defended Trump in criminal trials; DeSantis challenged him in 2024 primary

Why Market Might Be Right or Low:

  1. Axios sourcing quality: Reputable outlet with Trump confidant sources suggests real interest
  2. Long resolution window: 2.7 years allows for multiple scenarios to unfold
  3. Trump unpredictability: He has history of sudden reversals and surprising picks
  4. Political reconciliation: The Doral meeting suggests genuine fence-mending

Estimated True Probability: 1.8%

This represents:

  • 35% chance no one gets confirmed before DeSantis becomes available/interested
  • 15% chance DeSantis becomes Trump's first choice among available candidates
  • 35% chance DeSantis accepts if offered (balancing private interest vs. public denial)
  • Combined: 0.35 × 0.15 × 0.35 ≈ 1.8%

Edge Assessment: Market at 2.25% appears slightly overpriced by ~0.4-0.5 percentage points (25% relative overvaluation). The public denial, Blanche's strong position, and sequential resolution structure suggest true odds closer to 1.5-2.0% rather than 2.25%.

Key Factors.

  • Todd Blanche's incumbency advantage as Acting AG with explicit Trump endorsement of 'audition' role

  • Sequential resolution structure: DeSantis must be FIRST confirmed, if anyone else confirmed first his contract goes to NO permanently

  • DeSantis's public denial on April 23, 2026 creates reputational cost to accepting role now

  • DeSantis still serving as Florida Governor until January 2027, making him unavailable for 8 months

  • Axios reporting suggests genuine private interest despite public denial, but creates uncertainty

  • Blanche actively proving loyalty through controversial actions (dropping Powell probe, firing career prosecutors)

  • Long resolution window (2.7 years) allows multiple scenarios but Blanche confirmation likely happens soon

  • Trump's pattern of rewarding personal loyalty and legal defenders over traditional qualifications

Scenarios.

Blanche Confirmed First (Base Case)

68%

Todd Blanche successfully completes his 'audition' and Trump nominates him for permanent AG role. Senate confirms him (likely GOP majority). DeSantis contract resolves to NO permanently since Blanche was confirmed first.

Trigger: Trump announces Blanche nomination within next 2-3 months; Blanche continues loyalty-proving actions like pursuing Trump's political priorities; Senate GOP whip count shows clear confirmation path.

Alternative Candidate First (Likely Zeldin)

30%

Trump decides Blanche lacks gravitas or makes mistake. Nominates Lee Zeldin or another alternative (not DeSantis) who gets confirmed first. DeSantis contract resolves to NO.

Trigger: Signs of Trump dissatisfaction with Blanche; Zeldin leaves EPA role; Conservative media criticism of Blanche's legal strategies; Trump meetings with other potential AG candidates.

DeSantis Becomes First Confirmed AG

2%

Through extended acting AG period or Blanche failure, DeSantis becomes available and Trump's first choice. DeSantis reverses public denial and accepts nomination. Gets confirmed before anyone else.

Trigger: Blanche remains Acting AG through 2026 without permanent nomination; DeSantis term ends January 2027; New reports of Trump-DeSantis meetings; DeSantis spokesperson walks back April denial; Formal nomination announcement.

Extended Limbo (No Confirmation by Early 2027)

0%

Trump leaves Acting AG in place indefinitely, market remains unresolved. Eventually someone other than the three main candidates emerges and gets confirmed first.

Trigger: Blanche remains Acting AG through 2026; Trump distracted by other priorities; Senate confirmation battles on other nominees; Emergence of dark horse candidate in 2027-2028.

Risks.

  • Trump's extreme unpredictability—he frequently makes surprising personnel choices that defy conventional analysis

  • Private Trump-DeSantis conversations may contradict DeSantis's public statements; Axios sourcing suggests substantive discussions occurred

  • Extended Acting AG scenario is more plausible than baseline assumes—Trump has left acting officials in place for long periods when convenient

  • Senate dynamics unknown—if GOP loses Senate in 2026 midterms (unlikely but possible), confirmation calculus changes dramatically

  • Multiple roles in play—DeSantis expressed interest in Defense Secretary and SCOTUS per Axios; might pursue those instead if offered

  • Blanche could make disqualifying mistake during 'audition' period, opening door faster than expected

  • Political reconciliation between Trump-DeSantis may be deeper than public evidence suggests, making DeSantis more likely first choice

  • Market liquidity and information advantages—political insiders may know more about private discussions than public reporting reveals

Edge Assessment.

SLIGHT EDGE ON NO: The market at 2.25% appears marginally overpriced compared to estimated true probability of ~1.8%. This represents approximately 25% relative overvaluation (0.45 percentage point absolute overpricing).

The key factors supporting NO position:

  1. Blanche's dominant frontrunner status (65%+ odds) means high probability someone else confirmed first
  2. DeSantis's credible public denial creates political cost to reversal
  3. 8-month unavailability while serving as Governor creates timing mismatch with Trump's need for permanent AG
  4. Sequential resolution structure is harsh—even if DeSantis eventually gets a cabinet role, it doesn't help if someone else becomes AG first

However, edge is SMALL because:

  • Axios reporting has high credibility, suggesting genuine private interest
  • 2.7-year resolution window creates tail risk scenarios
  • Trump's unpredictability means fat tails on probability distribution
  • Market may have superior information from political insider flow

RECOMMENDATION: Market appears roughly efficient with slight overpricing. Edge likely too small to justify position given bid-ask spreads and capital lockup until 2029. Would need market to rise above 3-4% to have clear NO edge, or drop below 1% to have clear YES edge.

What Would Change Our Mind.

  • Trump publicly criticizes Blanche or signals dissatisfaction with his performance as Acting AG, weakening the frontrunner's position significantly

  • Blanche remains in Acting AG role through December 2026 without permanent nomination, suggesting Trump is waiting for DeSantis to become available in January 2027

  • New credible reporting of substantive Trump-DeSantis meetings or negotiations about cabinet positions, particularly if DeSantis spokesperson walks back the April 23 denial

  • DeSantis announces early resignation as Florida Governor before January 2027, indicating willingness to pursue federal appointment immediately

  • Market price rises above 3-4%, creating clearer NO edge, or drops below 1%, creating potential YES opportunity

  • Lee Zeldin leaves EPA role or is publicly ruled out for AG consideration, removing the second-choice alternative and potentially improving DeSantis's relative position

  • Senate Republicans lose majority in 2026 midterms (results would be known by November 2026), dramatically changing confirmation dynamics and potentially favoring DeSantis's statewide electoral credibility

  • Trump nominates and Senate confirms Blanche or another candidate for permanent AG—this would cause immediate resolution to NO for DeSantis contract

Sources.

Get This Via API.

Access real-time prediction market analysis programmatically. Every analysis on this page is available through our REST API.

curl -X POST https://api.rekko.ai/v1/markets/kalshi/TICKER/analyze \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"

Related Analysis.

entertainmentkalshi
NO TRADE

Will Blue Origin land on the moon before SpaceX?

The market's 70.5% implied probability that Blue Origin lands before SpaceX aligns closely with my 68% estimate, indicating efficient pricing. Blue Origin holds a structural advantage: their Blue Moon MK1 lander is already in thermal vacuum testing at NASA JSC (shipped January 2026) with a single-launch direct-to-Moon architecture targeting late 2026/early 2027, while SpaceX's June 2027 internal target depends on successfully demonstrating unprecedented orbital cryogenic refueling with ~10 tanker flights—a technology never proven at scale. The 6-12 month timeline advantage plus architectural simplicity (no refueling choreography) favors Blue Origin, but significant risks remain: New Glenn has never flown, thermal vacuum testing could reveal issues, and SpaceX's superior execution track record creates meaningful upset potential. The 3.75-year buffer until the January 1, 2030 deadline allows multiple attempt opportunities for both parties. The 2.5 percentage point difference between market odds and my estimate falls well within analytical uncertainty for this novel technical race.

68%Apr 10, 2026
entertainmentkalshi
NO TRADE

Will Blue Origin land on the moon before SpaceX?

The market prices Blue Origin landing first at 70.5%, while my analysis estimates 68% probability—a marginal difference suggesting the market is reasonably well-calibrated. Blue Origin holds substantial advantages: their MK1 lander 'Endurance' is already built and in final testing (as of January 2026) with a Q3/Q4 2026 launch target, approximately 12 months ahead of SpaceX's June 2027 internal timeline. Critically, Blue Origin's direct-to-moon architecture requires only a single New Glenn launch with no orbital refueling, while SpaceX must first master untested orbital propellant transfer technology across multiple launches—a far more complex undertaking. However, Blue Origin faces meaningful risks: New Glenn only just began flight operations in early 2026 with limited heritage, and first-time lunar landings historically have 30-40% failure rates. My 68% estimate accounts for ~39% probability Blue Origin succeeds on nominal timeline, ~29% they succeed after setbacks but before SpaceX, ~20% SpaceX pulls off an upset victory, and ~12% neither succeeds before the 2030 deadline. The 2.5-point gap suggests modest theoretical value on "No" (SpaceX wins), but this edge falls within uncertainty margins and may not be actionable.

68%Apr 11, 2026
entertainmentkalshi
NO TRADE

Will Blue Origin land on the moon before SpaceX?

Based on analysis grounded in April 2026, I estimate a 72% probability that Blue Origin lands Blue Moon MK1 before SpaceX lands Starship on the lunar surface (before January 1, 2030), compared to the market's 69% implied probability. This small 3-percentage-point edge favors Blue Origin primarily due to architectural advantages: Blue Moon uses a proven single-launch direct trajectory requiring no orbital refueling, while SpaceX must first demonstrate unproven cryogenic propellant transfer technology, then deploy a depot, execute 10+ tanker launches, and only then attempt lunar landing. Blue Origin's hardware advantage is concrete—MK1-SN001 is currently in thermal vacuum testing at NASA JSC with a late 2026 launch target on the now-operational New Glenn rocket—while SpaceX's first basic refueling demonstration isn't scheduled until June 2026 (two months away) and their leaked internal lunar landing target of June 2027 appears optimistic given the unproven technology dependencies. The 6-9 month timeline buffer and reduced mission complexity favor Blue Origin, though significant execution risks remain for both companies attempting their first lunar landings. The market appears slightly undervaluing Blue Origin's structural advantages while appropriately pricing in New Glenn's limited flight heritage and general lunar landing difficulty.

72%Apr 15, 2026
Pipeline: 180.4sSources: 4View market

This analysis is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice. Market conditions change rapidly.